can agree on Mjolnir is that there is nothing further to be won or lost here on this discussion. The one thing I hope you do (if you are actually in the insurance busines and hope to stay in it for longer than the six months you might have been in it) and that is learn about how the insurance industry works and how dispute resolution is handled in the courts; For you obviously don\’t know anything about how the court\’s work and what it means when you lose and are directed to pay punitive damages.
When you other dumb apologists read this please take heed, but most all of you are beyond hope.
I am glad to see everyone posting such eloquent and FACTUAL responses. No, Joe, not you.
\”You should take a basic reading course. It is the State Farm apologists who suggest that the settling of claims and the dismissal of the grand jury is coincidence.\”
That is what *you* suggested Joe. Or, are you confusing yourself? I can imagine how that is an easy thing to do. As in you suggested they were going to be indicted and COINCIDENTALLY they decided to reopen the cases. So, you\’re wrong, case closed.
They lost ALL CASES? As someone else pointed out, that\’s not true. Regardless of how big or small the case was, they didn\’t lose. You\’re wrong, case closed.
P.S. Even if they had lost all cases so far, that\’s what? A whopping 4 or 5? You\’ve probably gotten fired from jobs 4 or 5 times… does that make you unintelligent? No, you just are…
please take Jewel, Dale, & some of the other apologists by the hand and lead them to the land of Oz so they might follow the yellow brick road with Dorothy and company and get a brain from the wizard.
\”He maintained that despite the fact the industry settled 98 percent of claims, “hysterical media” reports made it appear no claims were paid. Mr. Soto said the carrier associations should have been out with a stronger defense of the industry initially. Failure to do so has resulted in the industry getting “hit over the head” repeatedly with punitive legislation it does not deserve, he remarked.\”
It seems as if Joe got sucked into the media frenzy the way people do when they believe everything they read.
\”Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Co. has agreed to settle out of court with 34 policyholders in Mississippi who sued the insurer over damage to their homes from Hurricane Katrina, a lawyer for the policyholders said Tuesday.\”
Hmm… Didn\’t Joe say that the only insurers who hadn\’t paid were SF, Allstate and Nationwide? I guess Joe is a Met apologist.
Can\’t we just share the brain you have? Who did you borrow it from? The dumbest man on Earth?
Maybe he would like it back now… I really am sorry Joe. I\’m sorry that you have to live with being so unintelligent. It must be hard to remember to breathe and chew at the same time. :(
I have not been proven wrong. The State Farm apologists hijacked this thread from the beginning, not I. Your continued defense of a loser in court shows your blind loyalty, regardless of the facts. BTW, one of the things you and other apologists should learn is adjudicated and compromised are two separate concepts. And even when you compromise from a stance of 100% denial, you have conceded more than the other party. Please take the blinders off and maybe there is room on the yellow brick road for you. Again it is the citizens of Mississippi who have suffered from the shenanigans of State Farm for no reason.
You\’re the only one who\’s presented facts?
Quite to the contrary! You\’re the only one who has proven to be an outright liar!
Where are the criminal charges you\’ve been presenting as \”facts\” for the past few weeks? We now find out that your facts are based on coincidences. If you have a dictionary handy, you should read the definition of what a fact is and what a coincidence is. They are far from the same.
You get proven wrong, you get explanations as to why your perspective is flawed, and you get owned by half the board.
Your response is to call us apologists and tell us to get a clue.
Pal, we\’ve been giving you clues and you aren\’t following them. You\’re the one so far out in left field that you\’re not even playing the same game as we are.
Quit with the apologist BS.
Nobody\’s apologizing for State Farms mistakes. We\’re attacking you because you live in a small fantasy land where a company that fails to pay 2% of outstanding claims and has to pay on less than 1% of outstanding claims is some sort of ravenous monster.
The carriers in Louisiana paid 98% of the claims worth billions of dollars, and you manufacture sojme conspiracy theory over the remaining 2%.
Would you please just shut up?
You\’re wrong, you have no sense of perspective, and you don\’t seem to realize how stupid you look.
We have updated our privacy policy to be more clear and meet the new requirements of the GDPR. By continuing to use our site, you accept our revised Privacy Policy.
can agree on Mjolnir is that there is nothing further to be won or lost here on this discussion. The one thing I hope you do (if you are actually in the insurance busines and hope to stay in it for longer than the six months you might have been in it) and that is learn about how the insurance industry works and how dispute resolution is handled in the courts; For you obviously don\’t know anything about how the court\’s work and what it means when you lose and are directed to pay punitive damages.
When you other dumb apologists read this please take heed, but most all of you are beyond hope.
I am glad to see everyone posting such eloquent and FACTUAL responses. No, Joe, not you.
\”You should take a basic reading course. It is the State Farm apologists who suggest that the settling of claims and the dismissal of the grand jury is coincidence.\”
That is what *you* suggested Joe. Or, are you confusing yourself? I can imagine how that is an easy thing to do. As in you suggested they were going to be indicted and COINCIDENTALLY they decided to reopen the cases. So, you\’re wrong, case closed.
They lost ALL CASES? As someone else pointed out, that\’s not true. Regardless of how big or small the case was, they didn\’t lose. You\’re wrong, case closed.
P.S. Even if they had lost all cases so far, that\’s what? A whopping 4 or 5? You\’ve probably gotten fired from jobs 4 or 5 times… does that make you unintelligent? No, you just are…
You were wrong. You were proved wrong.
Insurers are winning cases.
Now sack up and admit that your narrow world view is incorrect. Once you do that, you may be surprised by the things you discover.
All we need to know about you is encapsulated by the fact that this is a story about Nationwide, and you\’re on here crying about State Farm.
You\’re a zealot, and it\’s not pretty.
please take Jewel, Dale, & some of the other apologists by the hand and lead them to the land of Oz so they might follow the yellow brick road with Dorothy and company and get a brain from the wizard.
\”He maintained that despite the fact the industry settled 98 percent of claims, “hysterical media” reports made it appear no claims were paid. Mr. Soto said the carrier associations should have been out with a stronger defense of the industry initially. Failure to do so has resulted in the industry getting “hit over the head” repeatedly with punitive legislation it does not deserve, he remarked.\”
It seems as if Joe got sucked into the media frenzy the way people do when they believe everything they read.
\”Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Co. has agreed to settle out of court with 34 policyholders in Mississippi who sued the insurer over damage to their homes from Hurricane Katrina, a lawyer for the policyholders said Tuesday.\”
Hmm… Didn\’t Joe say that the only insurers who hadn\’t paid were SF, Allstate and Nationwide? I guess Joe is a Met apologist.
And he is proven wrong YET again.
Can\’t we just share the brain you have? Who did you borrow it from? The dumbest man on Earth?
Maybe he would like it back now… I really am sorry Joe. I\’m sorry that you have to live with being so unintelligent. It must be hard to remember to breathe and chew at the same time. :(
I have not been proven wrong. The State Farm apologists hijacked this thread from the beginning, not I. Your continued defense of a loser in court shows your blind loyalty, regardless of the facts. BTW, one of the things you and other apologists should learn is adjudicated and compromised are two separate concepts. And even when you compromise from a stance of 100% denial, you have conceded more than the other party. Please take the blinders off and maybe there is room on the yellow brick road for you. Again it is the citizens of Mississippi who have suffered from the shenanigans of State Farm for no reason.
Joe grow up and stop being a Met apologist.
You\’re the only one who\’s presented facts?
Quite to the contrary! You\’re the only one who has proven to be an outright liar!
Where are the criminal charges you\’ve been presenting as \”facts\” for the past few weeks? We now find out that your facts are based on coincidences. If you have a dictionary handy, you should read the definition of what a fact is and what a coincidence is. They are far from the same.
You get proven wrong, you get explanations as to why your perspective is flawed, and you get owned by half the board.
Your response is to call us apologists and tell us to get a clue.
Pal, we\’ve been giving you clues and you aren\’t following them. You\’re the one so far out in left field that you\’re not even playing the same game as we are.
Quit with the apologist BS.
Nobody\’s apologizing for State Farms mistakes. We\’re attacking you because you live in a small fantasy land where a company that fails to pay 2% of outstanding claims and has to pay on less than 1% of outstanding claims is some sort of ravenous monster.
The carriers in Louisiana paid 98% of the claims worth billions of dollars, and you manufacture sojme conspiracy theory over the remaining 2%.
Would you please just shut up?
You\’re wrong, you have no sense of perspective, and you don\’t seem to realize how stupid you look.