Insurer Doesn’t Have to Pay for Miss. Pastor’s Sex Charge Defense

September 6, 2007

  • September 6, 2007 at 3:39 am
    Nobody Important says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Nice tolerance of other peoples beliefs Adrian. Puts you right up there with the Bin Ladens of the world in terms of tolerance.

  • September 6, 2007 at 3:45 am
    Al says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Believer, Adrian will not be swayed by arguments from Scripture without divine intervention. He would just dismiss the Bible out of hand (probably having never read it). I was wondering what he would say to my implication that atheism is irrational, given that before one can declare that someone does not exist, when billions of people have and do insist exists, one must have looked for Him everywhere with certainty that He has not hidden Himself from him.

    Since he probably hasn’t looked at the bottom of the ocean and certainly hasn’t looked on Io, and everywhere in between and beyond, and cannot be sure that God has not hidden Himself, he cannot rationally assert atheism. So he clams up.

    He is content to feel superior to the cretin who was the subject of this news item, while leaving off the consideration of Pol Pot and other atheist notables.

  • September 6, 2007 at 3:53 am
    Mary B. says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Alright people, let the religion thing go. Adrian is allowed his beliefs just like you are allowed to believe in yours. Deal with it, move on and quit being so thin skinned. For the record Adrian, I agree with you.

    As for the judge, great ruling. This pastor is a moron is he thinks sexual assult is not an intentional act. I am surprised that looney Kim David isn’t on here SCREAMING that state farm screwed this pastor out of coverage because of “hidden exclusions” in the policy, re: intentional acts.

  • September 6, 2007 at 4:05 am
    Al says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Wow, Mary scolds debaters then takes sides in an argument of which she pretends to disapprove. What a phony.

    And some gals wonder why we watch so much football.

  • September 6, 2007 at 4:26 am
    Dave says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Up until now, members of other religions had the decency to keep their mouths shut about sexual encounters with religious leaders. As a Catholic, I find it repugnant that so many people have said absolutely nothing about alleged abuse for decades. Suddenly, when the almighty smell of money came into play, they start with their pathetic public confessions. You have to know that the Catholic church doesn’t have a corner on the promiscuity market.

  • September 6, 2007 at 4:36 am
    Mark says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Yes he’s reformed. He used to molest Methodists, but now he’s going after non-denominational Protestants.
    What sort of an attorney would take a case like this?

  • September 6, 2007 at 4:37 am
    Al says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Actually, public school teachers are much more frequently molesters of boys and small women than priests are.

  • September 6, 2007 at 5:05 am
    Mark says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I’m sure that’s true, but how many hundreds of thousands of teachers are there vs the number of priests in America?
    It is definitely true that the Catholic Church does not have the only molesters out there.

  • September 6, 2007 at 5:20 am
    Nobody Important says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    No Mary, Adrian started the attacks on religion for no reason. I am not a religious person, but just because I’m not is no reason for me to ridicule someone else’s beliefs. After all, none of us know who in reality is right. Some claim to, but they won’t know until its too late to post us and let us know for sure.

  • September 6, 2007 at 5:49 am
    Good Hands says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Yeah but that was BILL CLINTON! And the real fight was over on top of limits.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*