Forecasters Expect More Active Atlantic Hurricane Season Next Year

December 11, 2009

  • December 11, 2009 at 2:35 am
    Seer says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    It was a joke. Stats are easily manipulated though.

  • December 11, 2009 at 2:43 am
    Nostradamus says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Are these the same “pros” that said this year would be a bad year for hurricanes?

    Seriously. Please, get a real job.

  • December 11, 2009 at 2:56 am
    EGoyle says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Now that they have been exposed for their false data, they are now praying more and more for this to happen as they are hanging by a shoestring. Notice they also said that 2010 will be the coldest year on record? How in the heck with they know? They already called 2009 the coldest year on record and the year is not over yet! Also boy is it cold outside. IJ has bought into this global warming nonsense and not they are not looking very good. They have backed off over the last year, but here they are again! They have an editor who is so invested in the left, they literally have now have to manufacter global warming!

  • December 11, 2009 at 3:02 am
    Matt says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    No doubt there is a lot of historical data, science and logic behind the results, but after years of inaccuracy, it’s frustrating to think that insurance carriers may consider these results for guidance on how they plan to release aggregate into the market – indirectly affecting pricing through simple economics, supply and demand.

  • December 11, 2009 at 3:26 am
    youngin' says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Who is this They you speak of? Please be specific in your response.

    Thanks

  • December 11, 2009 at 3:45 am
    Chilly says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    …the third race Monday at Pimlico?

  • December 11, 2009 at 3:56 am
    Far Right says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Allen, PLEASE! Cut me some slack!

  • December 11, 2009 at 4:12 am
    Joe says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Allan is a true believer, not a denier… How can you deny all of the facts when we have proof that the global temperature is .7 degrees higher now than 100 years ago? We know that 100 years ago our data collection was phenomenal even though most of the world’s inhabitants were still sh#tting outside…

  • December 11, 2009 at 4:18 am
    Bill says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    100 years ago there were 5.5 BILLION less people on earth. You want to blame global warming on something just blame it on the extra 5,428,500,000,000 degrees that the human tempertaure alone adds to the earths atmosphere. What if the sun is radiating more energy toward earth….there are so many reasons for the earth to be warmer. Again, all of this goes back to money. Someone needs a grant to do their global warming research.

  • December 11, 2009 at 4:35 am
    Chilly says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    http://www.factcheck.org/2009/12/climategate/

    “Hacked e-mails show climate scientists in a bad light but don’t change scientific consensus on global warming.”

    Consensuschmensus.
    http://www.junkscience.com/

    30,000 US scientists have signed a petition declaring themselves to be global warming skeptics, only 2,500 scientists are involved in the UN IPCC fiasco, which is of course the channel for all East Anglia CRU disinformation.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*