YOU CAN CHOOSE TO EAT IT RED AND JUCY, PINKO, OR NOT AT ALL. DO YOU REALLY THINK LIBERAL BILLARY HAS A CHANCE IN NOVEMBER? SERVE IT UP ON A PLATE AND SEE HOW AMERICA SWALLOWS IT. SOME AMERICANS HAVE BRAINS & CAN CHOOSE TO HAVE WELL DONE, IF THEY WANT. I DON’T LIKE IT THAT WAY, BUT THIS IS STILL AMERICA AND WE HAVE THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO CHOOSE WEATHER TO EAT OR NOT TO EAT. BILLARY WILL MAKE YOU EAT IT “HER WAY” IF ELECTED AND BIG INSURANCE PLANS OUR MENU. I PROMISE YOU, NO MATTER HOW YOU LIKE YOUR STEAK; IT’S NOT ON THE MENU. I LIKE MY STEAK RED AND JUCY, NOT PINK OR OVER COOKED. WE HAVE A CHOICE WHEN IT COMES TO WHAT WE EAT. I DON’T LIKE ANYTHING CRAMED DOWN MY THROAT. MABY IT’S BECAUSE I WORK HARD, HAVE A BRAIN, AND CAN MAKE MY OWN CHOICE TO EAT THE WAY I CHOOSE. I DON’T NEED A LIBERAL BILLARY TO TELL ME I HAVE TO EAT IT PINK AND SLICE IT UP FOR EVERYONE ELSE IN LINE TO PARTAKE EVENLY. I KNOW PLENTY OF PEOPLE WHO LIKE THEIR STEAK WELL DONE AND OTHERS WHO THINK EATING MEAT IS JUST WRONG. WHO EVER SAID HEALTH CARE IS AN ENTITLEMENT SHOULD READ THE CONSTITUDION AGAIN, BECAUSE, I DON’T REMEMBER IS SAYING ANY ONE SPECIAL INTEREST / INDUSTRY SHOULD BE GURANTEED A ENTITEMENT / PROFIT.
I AM GOING TO LUNCH NOW TO DIGEST THIS ISSUE, AND I THINK YOU KNOW HOW I’LL PLACE MY ORDER NOW AND IN NOVEMBER.
Hussein? So what if that is his middle name? I didn’t realize that your name discounted you from being elected. Oh right, this is America. Attack him on his policies and stances, not his middle name. BTW I am not a registered Democrat or Republican. I am simply making an observation that those who focus on Obama’s name are ignorant (note I didn’t say stupid, there is a distinction there). I guess you believe he is a muslim, too. If so I have a email I can send you where you can make 1 million dollars by simply sending me your account info and ssn.
Al, it was CIA reports heard on Fox News that told me Al-Quaida was not in Iraq prior to us invading. Hussein was not a religious person, he had no truck with bin Laden so kept his group out of his country (easy to do when you’re a brutal dictator with few scruples).
And there is no proof that fighting in Iraq has kept American soil safe. I may be missing a couple things, but I believe I have the big ones: 1940 – Pearl Harbor (not terrorism, but an attack on US soil); 1993 – WTC; 2001 – WTC. Feel free to add in overseas attacks, but be fair and count them all because not all attacks on US interests happened during the Clinton era.
Both Bush and Clinton took money from Saudis. The US has been kissing the Kingdom’s rear for decades.
Clinton had a few opportunities to take out bin Laden and should have.
What radicals on both sides need to recognize is that we have not had a great president for decades. Neither Bush, Clinton, Reagan, Carter, Johnson, Nixon . . . our last great that most people can agree on was FDR (too much controversy over JFK). Bush is not the savior the far right lauds him to be. Bush is simply connected. Hillary would not be a great savior either. Nor would Obama. Nor would McCain. Nor would anybody else running currently. None of them has the guts and the nation doesn’t seem to want to hear the truth.
Vilifying Clinton only makes you sound narrow-minded. Recognize that Bush has made mistakes too, and you will garner greater respect.
“United Nations imposed a number of requirements on Iraq, among them disarmament of all weapons of mass destruction, stocks used to make such weapons, and laboratories necessary to do the work. Saddam Hussein agreed, and an inspection system was set up to ensure compliance. And though he repeatedly lied, delayed, and obstructed the inspections work, the inspectors found and destroyed far more weapons of mass destruction capability than were destroyed in the Gulf War, including thousands of chemical weapons, large volumes of chemical and biological stocks, a number of missiles and warheads, a major lab equipped to produce anthrax and other bio-weapons, as well as substantial nuclear facilities.
“In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members, though there is apparently no evidence of his involvement in the terrible events of September 11, 2001.” -Hillary Clinton http://clinton.senate.gov/speeches/iraq_101002.html
We have updated our privacy policy to be more clear and meet the new requirements of the GDPR. By continuing to use our site, you accept our revised Privacy Policy.
YOU CAN CHOOSE TO EAT IT RED AND JUCY, PINKO, OR NOT AT ALL. DO YOU REALLY THINK LIBERAL BILLARY HAS A CHANCE IN NOVEMBER? SERVE IT UP ON A PLATE AND SEE HOW AMERICA SWALLOWS IT. SOME AMERICANS HAVE BRAINS & CAN CHOOSE TO HAVE WELL DONE, IF THEY WANT. I DON’T LIKE IT THAT WAY, BUT THIS IS STILL AMERICA AND WE HAVE THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO CHOOSE WEATHER TO EAT OR NOT TO EAT. BILLARY WILL MAKE YOU EAT IT “HER WAY” IF ELECTED AND BIG INSURANCE PLANS OUR MENU. I PROMISE YOU, NO MATTER HOW YOU LIKE YOUR STEAK; IT’S NOT ON THE MENU. I LIKE MY STEAK RED AND JUCY, NOT PINK OR OVER COOKED. WE HAVE A CHOICE WHEN IT COMES TO WHAT WE EAT. I DON’T LIKE ANYTHING CRAMED DOWN MY THROAT. MABY IT’S BECAUSE I WORK HARD, HAVE A BRAIN, AND CAN MAKE MY OWN CHOICE TO EAT THE WAY I CHOOSE. I DON’T NEED A LIBERAL BILLARY TO TELL ME I HAVE TO EAT IT PINK AND SLICE IT UP FOR EVERYONE ELSE IN LINE TO PARTAKE EVENLY. I KNOW PLENTY OF PEOPLE WHO LIKE THEIR STEAK WELL DONE AND OTHERS WHO THINK EATING MEAT IS JUST WRONG. WHO EVER SAID HEALTH CARE IS AN ENTITLEMENT SHOULD READ THE CONSTITUDION AGAIN, BECAUSE, I DON’T REMEMBER IS SAYING ANY ONE SPECIAL INTEREST / INDUSTRY SHOULD BE GURANTEED A ENTITEMENT / PROFIT.
I AM GOING TO LUNCH NOW TO DIGEST THIS ISSUE, AND I THINK YOU KNOW HOW I’LL PLACE MY ORDER NOW AND IN NOVEMBER.
Hussein? So what if that is his middle name? I didn’t realize that your name discounted you from being elected. Oh right, this is America. Attack him on his policies and stances, not his middle name. BTW I am not a registered Democrat or Republican. I am simply making an observation that those who focus on Obama’s name are ignorant (note I didn’t say stupid, there is a distinction there). I guess you believe he is a muslim, too. If so I have a email I can send you where you can make 1 million dollars by simply sending me your account info and ssn.
Al, it was CIA reports heard on Fox News that told me Al-Quaida was not in Iraq prior to us invading. Hussein was not a religious person, he had no truck with bin Laden so kept his group out of his country (easy to do when you’re a brutal dictator with few scruples).
And there is no proof that fighting in Iraq has kept American soil safe. I may be missing a couple things, but I believe I have the big ones: 1940 – Pearl Harbor (not terrorism, but an attack on US soil); 1993 – WTC; 2001 – WTC. Feel free to add in overseas attacks, but be fair and count them all because not all attacks on US interests happened during the Clinton era.
Both Bush and Clinton took money from Saudis. The US has been kissing the Kingdom’s rear for decades.
Clinton had a few opportunities to take out bin Laden and should have.
What radicals on both sides need to recognize is that we have not had a great president for decades. Neither Bush, Clinton, Reagan, Carter, Johnson, Nixon . . . our last great that most people can agree on was FDR (too much controversy over JFK). Bush is not the savior the far right lauds him to be. Bush is simply connected. Hillary would not be a great savior either. Nor would Obama. Nor would McCain. Nor would anybody else running currently. None of them has the guts and the nation doesn’t seem to want to hear the truth.
Vilifying Clinton only makes you sound narrow-minded. Recognize that Bush has made mistakes too, and you will garner greater respect.
“United Nations imposed a number of requirements on Iraq, among them disarmament of all weapons of mass destruction, stocks used to make such weapons, and laboratories necessary to do the work. Saddam Hussein agreed, and an inspection system was set up to ensure compliance. And though he repeatedly lied, delayed, and obstructed the inspections work, the inspectors found and destroyed far more weapons of mass destruction capability than were destroyed in the Gulf War, including thousands of chemical weapons, large volumes of chemical and biological stocks, a number of missiles and warheads, a major lab equipped to produce anthrax and other bio-weapons, as well as substantial nuclear facilities.
“In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members, though there is apparently no evidence of his involvement in the terrible events of September 11, 2001.” -Hillary Clinton
http://clinton.senate.gov/speeches/iraq_101002.html
So, Hillary disagrees with you too.
Al, you mean I can’t trust the “fair and balanced” news network either? If I can’t trust conservative reporters, who can I trust? Dang it!
Can someone enlighten me as to what rederick is? And can discussing it or using it be off topic? Thanks.
I searched Google for “rederick” but all I could determine is that it may be a surname.
I can tell you what “rhetoric” is though… but I’m not sure if it would be considered “Off Topic”.
~shrugs~
Capitalization and correct spelling would be a start. A high school degree to post would also help.
So the IJ staff states says that the war in Iraq was a bad idea and everybody knows it. Journalism is supposed to be neutral and unbiased.
Forgive me if I’m wrong, but for whatever reason, I don’t believe you’re actually a member of the “Insurance Journal Staff”.
Your spelling and punctuation aren’t exactly on par with a professional journalist.
But, if by chance you really are, how would your editor in chief like to know you just referred to the readers as “children” who need to “shut up”?
Since you’re on the “Staff” and all, why don’t you just lock the thread? Then we “children” would have no choice but to “shut up”.