A new Senate bill would hold dog owners liable when their dogs bite “innocent victims,” but would also relieve owners who prove they couldn’t know their dogs were dangerous.
This marks the General Assembly’s third consecutive attempt to revise its dog bite policy. It aims for a compromise between the strict liability bills favored by the Senate and more lenient ones approved by the House.
However, Sen. Robert Zirkin, a Baltimore County Democrat who litigates dog-bite cases on behalf of plaintiffs, argued Thursday that the new bill leaves the burden solely on victims to prove the dogs were violent. He said it amounts to a “one free bite” policy.
Zirkin has introduced a counter-proposal, Senate Bill 286, that closely resembles the bill the House of Delegates rejected last year.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
The Great Hemp Reset: How the Federal Ban on Intoxicating Hemp Products Will Reshape Risk and Coverage
Deutsche Bank Settles Dispute With Ex-Top Manager Schiraldi
New Corgi, Liberate, VERVE Claims Tech. Do We Need New Acronyms?
Accenture Settles With Justice Department Over DEI Policies