A new Senate bill would hold dog owners liable when their dogs bite “innocent victims,” but would also relieve owners who prove they couldn’t know their dogs were dangerous.
This marks the General Assembly’s third consecutive attempt to revise its dog bite policy. It aims for a compromise between the strict liability bills favored by the Senate and more lenient ones approved by the House.
However, Sen. Robert Zirkin, a Baltimore County Democrat who litigates dog-bite cases on behalf of plaintiffs, argued Thursday that the new bill leaves the burden solely on victims to prove the dogs were violent. He said it amounts to a “one free bite” policy.
Zirkin has introduced a counter-proposal, Senate Bill 286, that closely resembles the bill the House of Delegates rejected last year.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Tesla Settles Some Worker Racism Claims as Bigger Trial Looms
The Field Inspection Gap: A Growing Structural Risk in Claims Handling
OpenAI CEO to Share Oversight Ideas in Wake of Trump AI Order
Zurich Insurance Expands Data-Center Offering Beyond the US