A new Senate bill would hold dog owners liable when their dogs bite “innocent victims,” but would also relieve owners who prove they couldn’t know their dogs were dangerous.
This marks the General Assembly’s third consecutive attempt to revise its dog bite policy. It aims for a compromise between the strict liability bills favored by the Senate and more lenient ones approved by the House.
However, Sen. Robert Zirkin, a Baltimore County Democrat who litigates dog-bite cases on behalf of plaintiffs, argued Thursday that the new bill leaves the burden solely on victims to prove the dogs were violent. He said it amounts to a “one free bite” policy.
Zirkin has introduced a counter-proposal, Senate Bill 286, that closely resembles the bill the House of Delegates rejected last year.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Report: Cargo Theft Down for Quarter, But Criminals Are Getting More Savvy
Bayer Banking on US Supreme Court’s Help to Rein in Roundup Lawsuits
Bayer Gets Mixed Reception at Supreme Court on Roundup Suits
Travelers to Expand Homeowners Insurance Offering in California