A state appellate court says a New Jersey driver had no legal grounds to claim a brain injury left her unable to understand police instructions about the consequence of refusing to take a breath test for alcohol.
The case stemmed from a March 2010 traffic stop in Woodbury.
The driver claimed brain damage from a 1978 injury prevented her from understanding the refusal statement an officer read her. Citing her disability, the woman said she should have been accommodated.
Gloucester County prosecutors said that despite her injury, the woman had earned college degrees and a special education teaching certification. She also wrote and illustrated children’s books.
In its opinion made public Wednesday, the court found the officer adequately instructed the woman and that she didn’t seek accommodation for a disability.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
French Supermarkets’ Cyber Insurance Unlikely to Cover Food Losses, Insurers Say
Isaias: 47,000 Claims and $582M in Losses in Florida So Far, OIR Reports
Home Insurance Tops Property Taxes in Squeeze for US Households
Uber Wins Bid to Dismiss £250 Million Black Cab Driver Suit