New York’s top court has rejected a product liability claim against tobacco companies for selling regular cigarettes when they could have used lower levels of tar and nicotine.
The Court of Appeals ruled that lawyers representing the late Norma Rose, who died after smoking regular cigarettes for more than 40 years, failed to prove that “light” cigarettes have the same effects as regulars.
The judges, upholding a midlevel court, say the only “utility” of a cigarette is to gratify a smoker’s desire for a certain experience, and it was unproven that light cigarettes do that as well as regular cigarettes.
The suit named Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., Philip Morris USA and other companies.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
UK Warned of Housing Market Risks as Flood Re’s Future Unclear
Airbus, Air France Found Guilty in 2009 Rio-Paris Crash
New York Homes Most Exposed to Hurricane Risk, Beating Miami
Lake Tahoe Power Crunch Shows AI’s Growing Energy Toll in West