New York’s top court has rejected a product liability claim against tobacco companies for selling regular cigarettes when they could have used lower levels of tar and nicotine.
The Court of Appeals ruled that lawyers representing the late Norma Rose, who died after smoking regular cigarettes for more than 40 years, failed to prove that “light” cigarettes have the same effects as regulars.
The judges, upholding a midlevel court, say the only “utility” of a cigarette is to gratify a smoker’s desire for a certain experience, and it was unproven that light cigarettes do that as well as regular cigarettes.
The suit named Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., Philip Morris USA and other companies.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Crypto Hack Spurs $463 Million in Customer Outflows at Bitget
Apollo’s Rowan Blasts Regulators for Handling of Walter Insurers
El NiƱo and Heat Fuel Destructive Storms Across Pacific Ocean
Slips, Trips And Falls: Why It’s Important to Get Ahead of An Incident