New York’s top court has rejected a product liability claim against tobacco companies for selling regular cigarettes when they could have used lower levels of tar and nicotine.
The Court of Appeals ruled that lawyers representing the late Norma Rose, who died after smoking regular cigarettes for more than 40 years, failed to prove that “light” cigarettes have the same effects as regulars.
The judges, upholding a midlevel court, say the only “utility” of a cigarette is to gratify a smoker’s desire for a certain experience, and it was unproven that light cigarettes do that as well as regular cigarettes.
The suit named Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., Philip Morris USA and other companies.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Navigating the Storm: A Claims Manager’s Guide to Class Action Exposure, Coverage and Reserves
Allstate’s AI Ecosystem to Include a Personal Agentic Assistant for Customers
Binance Hackers Used Fake Job Interviews in $6.3 Billion Heist
Register: Risky Future AI Tools for MGAs ‘Demo Day’ on November 10