This article is part of a sponsored series brought to you by Cotality. View Series
There’s an inconvenient trend that insurers are facing today: claims adjusters are burning out, leaving their jobs at concerning rates. Novice field adjusters routinely walk away before their first year is up. Mid-career adjusters are lured to less demanding insurance roles. Turnover is becoming disruptive at scale, and it’s happening right as insurers are facing more frequent, more complex claims than ever.
Contrary to the prevailing technology narrative, machines can’t simply take over adjusting work. Claims handling remains a fundamentally human discipline — when disaster strikes, policyholders want an empathetic, steady presence to navigate them to resolution, not an automated evaluation.
The problem: it’s difficult for anyone to sustain a high-stress job defined by mounting file counts and administrative overload. Hiring more people isn’t the fix, either — the industry can’t hire its way out of a workflow problem. What field teams need is relief from the paperwork burden that follows them home, so their time and expertise go toward the decisions that actually require human judgment.
Why field adjusters and claims organizations are feeling the strain
Carriers are operating in an increasingly difficult environment. Rising policyholder expectations, more severe weather events, and inflationary pressure demand insurers to push for faster cycle times. All the while, compliance and file accuracy stay non-negotiable. That pressure extends to field adjusters, for two reasons:
The cycle-time paradox. Insurers need rapid file turnaround to control loss adjustment expenses (LAE) and keep policyholders satisfied. But when workflows prioritize speed over field support, adjusters race through complex claims — producing documentation gaps and file revisions. The result is a rework cycle that frustrates adjusters and inflates costs for leadership.
Dying hands-on apprenticeship. Claims handling has long been an apprenticeship profession, with institutional knowledge passed down file by file. Today’s claim volumes leave senior adjusters too buried to mentor new hires directly. Then, as veterans retire, decades of expertise leave with them — widening the talent gap and leaving novice adjusters to face a steep, unsupported learning curve alone.
Break the burnout loop by fixing the field, not just the office
Technology can’t fix everything, but it can eliminate a meaningful share of what’s driving adjusters out the door. Three shifts matter most:
Closing the data-capture gap. The manual re-creation of field data at a desk — retyping notes, redrawing diagrams, re-keying measurements — is one of the largest hidden drivers of after-hours work and error-prone rework. Tools that let adjusters capture accurate, structured data once, on-site, remove an entire category of administrative burden.
Making documentation instantaneous rather than retrospective. Every hour between an inspection and its writeup is an hour where details fade and errors compound. Field-native technology that turns real-time observation directly into structured, priced documentation shrinks that gap to zero — letting adjusters close a file before they leave the driveway instead of after dinner.
Replacing missing mentorship with built-in guidance. As the apprenticeship model breaks down, technology can partially fill the gap: guided workflows that walk less experienced adjusters through carrier best practices step-by-step, reducing costly re-inspections and freeing senior staff from constant oversight duty.
Together, these shifts do more than save time. They return cognitive bandwidth to the people doing the work — bandwidth that goes toward what policyholders actually need: clear answers and a steady, human presence during a stressful moment.
Invest in your adjusters’ field tools; show them they matter
The industry won’t solve adjuster churn by asking field teams to do more with legacy processes. Retaining field talent means giving them tools built for the realities of field work, not repurposed desktop software. That is a signal that tells adjusters that their time, safety, and well-being matter.
Cotality™’s claims and analytics teams have been studying this shift closely. For a deeper look at how field-native technology is changing on-site settlement — and what it means for adjuster retention — join our expert-led Claims Unfiltered webinar, The Double-Entry Nightmare: Reimagining On-Site Settlement for the Modern Adjuster, Thursday, August 20 at 2PM ET / 11AM PT.
Register for the webinar here.
© 2026 Cotality. All rights reserved. While all of the content and information is believed to be accurate, the content and information is provided by Cotality “as is” for informational and educational purposes only with no guarantee, representation, or warranty, express or implied, of any kind including but not limited to as to the merchantability, non-infringement of intellectual property rights, completeness, accuracy, applicability, or fitness, in connection with the content or information or product and Cotality assumes no responsibility or liability whatsoever for the content or information or product or any reliance thereon. Cotality™, the Cotality logo, and Intelligence beyond bounds™ are the trademarks of CoreLogic, Inc. d/b/a Cotality or its affiliates or subsidiaries. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Severe Thunderstorms Across US Midwest Trigger Flood Warnings
UnitedHealth Investor Suit Alleges Security, Governance Lapses
Edison Judge Balks at Holding Utility Liable for LA Wildfire
Trump Wins Permission to Revise BBC Suit to Remove Brand Damage