An appeals court has ruled in favor of Copper Mountain Resort in a lawsuit filed by a doctor who says he was injured after unwittingly skiing off an unmarked cornice.
Rajeev Kumar accused Copper Mountain of negligence after the 2006 accident. A federal judge ruled for the resort and a federal appeals court affirmed the ruling Wednesday.
The appeals judges say Colorado law bars claims based on dangers inherent to skiing and that the overhang wasn’t a “specified freestyle terrain area” subject to labeling, as Kumar argued.
Kumar’s attorney, Ross Buchanan, says the opinion essentially says resorts don’t have to mark danger areas, even if there’s a history of injuries there.
The resort’s owner at the time of the incident, Intrawest, didn’t immediately respond to an email request for comment.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
The Future of Appraisal and the Rising Standard of Competency
Tesla Settles Some Worker Racism Claims as Bigger Trial Looms
BASF Warns Iran War Could Trigger Supply Chain Disruption for Carmakers
Biggest Diesel Shock Since 2022 Deals Another Blow to US Farmers