An appeals court has ruled in favor of Copper Mountain Resort in a lawsuit filed by a doctor who says he was injured after unwittingly skiing off an unmarked cornice.
Rajeev Kumar accused Copper Mountain of negligence after the 2006 accident. A federal judge ruled for the resort and a federal appeals court affirmed the ruling Wednesday.
The appeals judges say Colorado law bars claims based on dangers inherent to skiing and that the overhang wasn’t a “specified freestyle terrain area” subject to labeling, as Kumar argued.
Kumar’s attorney, Ross Buchanan, says the opinion essentially says resorts don’t have to mark danger areas, even if there’s a history of injuries there.
The resort’s owner at the time of the incident, Intrawest, didn’t immediately respond to an email request for comment.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Apollo Expands Asset-Level Risk Reviews to Reflect Impact of Extreme Weather
Waymo to Update Software Across Fleet After Major Power Failure
Jump Trading Faces $4 Billion Terraform Administrator Suit
‘Door Knocker’ Roofers Were Everywhere. NC Farm Bureau Saw an Opportunity