An appeals court has ruled in favor of Copper Mountain Resort in a lawsuit filed by a doctor who says he was injured after unwittingly skiing off an unmarked cornice.
Rajeev Kumar accused Copper Mountain of negligence after the 2006 accident. A federal judge ruled for the resort and a federal appeals court affirmed the ruling Wednesday.
The appeals judges say Colorado law bars claims based on dangers inherent to skiing and that the overhang wasn’t a “specified freestyle terrain area” subject to labeling, as Kumar argued.
Kumar’s attorney, Ross Buchanan, says the opinion essentially says resorts don’t have to mark danger areas, even if there’s a history of injuries there.
The resort’s owner at the time of the incident, Intrawest, didn’t immediately respond to an email request for comment.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
First Brands Judge Approves Examiner to Probe Fraud Allegations
Tesla, EEOC Plan Talks to Settle Factory Racism Suit
California Governor Seeks $200M to Replace EV Tax Credits Cut by Trump
California Bill Would Require Insurer Claims Handling Plans, And Double Penalties