An appeals court has ruled in favor of Copper Mountain Resort in a lawsuit filed by a doctor who says he was injured after unwittingly skiing off an unmarked cornice.
Rajeev Kumar accused Copper Mountain of negligence after the 2006 accident. A federal judge ruled for the resort and a federal appeals court affirmed the ruling Wednesday.
The appeals judges say Colorado law bars claims based on dangers inherent to skiing and that the overhang wasn’t a “specified freestyle terrain area” subject to labeling, as Kumar argued.
Kumar’s attorney, Ross Buchanan, says the opinion essentially says resorts don’t have to mark danger areas, even if there’s a history of injuries there.
The resort’s owner at the time of the incident, Intrawest, didn’t immediately respond to an email request for comment.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
AI for the Defense: Should Insurers or Law Firms Pay?
Bayer Banking on US Supreme Court’s Help to Rein in Roundup Lawsuits
Three Sentenced in Videoed Bear-Suit Attacks Insurance Fraud Case
California Jet Fuel Woes Deepen as Asia Flows Hit Decade Low