A South Florida man who two years ago won a U.S. Supreme Court case over the difference between a floating home and a vessel has lost a legal battle against the city of Riviera Beach.
A federal jury last week sided with the city, rejecting Fane Lozman’s claims that the city seized and destroyed his floating home in retaliation for his frequent comments at city meetings in violation of free speech rights.
Lozman had hoped to be repaid for the value of his home.
The Supreme Court decision essentially found that Riviera Beach wrongly seized the structure using U.S. maritime law because not everything that floats can be considered a vessel.
Lozman says he intends to appeal once again.
Copyright 2026 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
First Atlantic Hurricane of 2026 to Threaten US Gulf Coast
UIM Minimum Limits. A Coverage That May Not Pay?
Public Adjuster Coalition Unveils Ethics Code, Plans Complaint Board
Google Accused of Overcharging 20 Million Consumers in UK Class Action