Kimberly-Clark Corp. agreed to pay up to $40.4 million to resolve a criminal charge relating to the sale of adulterated MicroCool surgical gowns.
A filing in U.S. District Court in the Northern District of Texas charges Kimberly-Clark with one count of introducing adulterated surgical gowns into interstate commerce with an intent to defraud and mislead.
According to court filings, a Kimberly-Clark employee conducted fraudulent testing on Kimberly-Clark’s MicroCool gowns to avoid having to submit a premarket notification to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration after Kimberly-Clark made a change to the gowns, according to the U.S. Department of Justice.
A premarket notification is meant to show FDA that a medical device is as safe and effective as an already legally marketed device. Based on the fraudulent testing, Kimberly-Clark sold the gowns after the change without a new premarket notification, marketing the gowns as providing the highest level of protection against fluid and viruses, according to the DOJ.
The terms of a deferred prosecution agreement stipulate that Kimberly-Clark will pay up to $40.4 million, which consists of a monetary penalty of $24.5 million, a forfeiture of profits of $3.9 million and up to $12 million in victim compensation.
Surgical gowns sold in the U.S. are subject to regulation by the FDA, which recognizes a system of classification set forth by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) — known as the ANSI/AAMI PB70 standard. Under the ANSI/AAMI PB70 standard, the highest protection level for surgical gowns — AAMI Level 4 — is reserved for gowns intended to be used in surgeries and other high-risk medical procedures on patients suspected of having infectious diseases.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Truckers Who Fail English Tests Get Pulled Off Roads in Trump Crackdown
OpenAI And Microsoft Sued Over Murder-Suicide Blamed on ChatGPT
Insurance AI Demo Day Calendar Announced
NYT, Chicago Tribune Sue Perplexity AI as Copyright War Rages On