Here is an example of why either/or thinking is not going to get it and why broader perspective is required–even if Slim and others want us to be narrowly-focused little insure-bots serving Big Capital.
One example: Hunter was indeed insurance commissioner in Texas. His most important push was to end the state’s calculation of WC exp. mods’ and send that bit of bureaucracy to the NCCI. He made a comment on “useless filing cabinets filled with useless information.” Some long-term state employees specialized in this pursuit lost their employment. He then led and engineered the deregulation of WC rates in Texas (Surprise! that’s rights, folks!).
WC rates went into free fall helped along by a WC reform effort through which now Texas Senator Cornyn (the noted Bush lickspittle and mouthpiece) launched his political career. Hence, Hunter the Deregulator, Favorer of the Market, Tool of Business. (And also spawner of the Cornyn the conservative craven crazy). Go figure. Or, if we avoid either/or thinking, maybe Hunter the more efficient Regulator, the informed Favorer of the Market, the non-either/or Regulator…and Cornyn was just a bad joke on us all.
After 9-11, certainly a political event with worldwide implications (200 to 300 years of Western oil company interefence in the Middle East, just by the way and for example, or do we settle for the crazy idea floated by Bush/Rove/Cheney that “those people hate our freedowm,” whatever that was supposed to mean?), Texas WC rates stiffened. The ensuing several bad hurricane years kept a coastal hard market firmly in place so that WC was far more profitable for insurers than usual and unnecessarily costly for businesses and consuemrs of their products. Now, after a few good hurricane years, the coastal hard market is waning (more like collapsing) and WC rates are free-falling again. Reinsurance and windstorm writing are also bound up in much broader political matters, of course. I wonder how much of the new windstorm capacity is related to the impaired mortgage-backed securities…it is all related, Slim. That’s why we call it reality.
So actually, Hunter’s behavior has not been entirely market averse–to the contrary. He is just now playing his role as consumer advocate arguing to force personal lines rates down through political action. This is an entirely normal and expectable event–except perhaps in Putin’s Russia or in current China.
The economics of insurance underwriting cycles are never going to be understood widely so they will always remain a target for political action by either party as required to gain or maintain political power. (Hey, Slim, read Machiavelli’s The Prince or is that outside the approved insurance thought curriculum?). I am happy to see consumer advocates oppose Big Capital and its lap dog politicians–it wouldn’t be a good country without them.
The big picture, Slim–it’s called connecting the dots, ask Condi and Cheney and Bush–is that this government no longer represents or serves its people. Hey, even Lou Dobbs figured this one out. You seem to like that. Go figure. Too much sun on the brain in Arizona? Would Barry Goldwater recognize these “conservatives?”
Oh, well, I’ll just take your adivce and complete this worksheet to justify the IRPM and schedule credits that are needed to take this or that account away from someone else. Nothing like productive economic activity is there? Defoliating a victory garden sure works up an appetite!
Oh, so now it is against the law to make an excessive profit? Or is it just because insurance is regulated. I guess we are all going to jail? It will be crowded in there with all the Dr’s, hospital admin, Oil execs, trial attorneys, & government contractors.
The question is if there will be a middle class if the entitlement politics of the democrats get into power. Sorry, I know this is not relevant to the article but I see the American dream of achieving financial independence being eroded away by the entitlement attitude too many “American’s” now have.
You have been out of circulation a long time Media Mogul. Someone turn over your rock? You, Rosie and a few other nutters wouldn’t know how to keep a business in business for a month. Rosie, I know your posts are intended as jokes, but the joke is quite stale. Find a new place to bore people. Speaking of jokes, Robert Hunter is back and speaking nonsense.
Obviously, we are pleased to settle without costly and lengthy litigation,” said State Farm spokesman Fraser Engerman. He declined to comment further because terms of the settlement are confidential.
Documents and testimony that Bloomington, Ill.-based State Farm produced in previous court cases put clients in a good negotiating position, said William F. “Chip” Merlin, the policyholders’ attorney.
The material from State Farm officials indicated the company decided not to pay claims in areas hit by the storm surge, relying on policy language to deny claims without thorough investigations, Merlin said.
In cases in which wind and water combined to cause a loss, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled policy language precludes coverage.
However, Merlin said last week that does not relieve insurance companies of their duty under Mississippi law to fully investigate the cause of a loss and pay for wind damage covered under an all-perils policy
C’mon now, you know Rosie makes her comments & then abandons the site by putting her head back in the sand. She doesn’t revisit to see what we all have to compliment her on….thoughtful, reasoned blogging. At least we know one village has an idiot (or two?).
Hunter is leading an educational group to explain the basic economic rule of caveat emptor. Thanks CFA for pointing out that insurance companies are out to make a profit.
Where it gets stupid is… when he and cronies expect the insurance companies and regulators to pay his type by the attorney hour to provide this information.
We have updated our privacy policy to be more clear and meet the new requirements of the GDPR. By continuing to use our site, you accept our revised Privacy Policy.
Here is an example of why either/or thinking is not going to get it and why broader perspective is required–even if Slim and others want us to be narrowly-focused little insure-bots serving Big Capital.
One example: Hunter was indeed insurance commissioner in Texas. His most important push was to end the state’s calculation of WC exp. mods’ and send that bit of bureaucracy to the NCCI. He made a comment on “useless filing cabinets filled with useless information.” Some long-term state employees specialized in this pursuit lost their employment. He then led and engineered the deregulation of WC rates in Texas (Surprise! that’s rights, folks!).
WC rates went into free fall helped along by a WC reform effort through which now Texas Senator Cornyn (the noted Bush lickspittle and mouthpiece) launched his political career. Hence, Hunter the Deregulator, Favorer of the Market, Tool of Business. (And also spawner of the Cornyn the conservative craven crazy). Go figure. Or, if we avoid either/or thinking, maybe Hunter the more efficient Regulator, the informed Favorer of the Market, the non-either/or Regulator…and Cornyn was just a bad joke on us all.
After 9-11, certainly a political event with worldwide implications (200 to 300 years of Western oil company interefence in the Middle East, just by the way and for example, or do we settle for the crazy idea floated by Bush/Rove/Cheney that “those people hate our freedowm,” whatever that was supposed to mean?), Texas WC rates stiffened. The ensuing several bad hurricane years kept a coastal hard market firmly in place so that WC was far more profitable for insurers than usual and unnecessarily costly for businesses and consuemrs of their products. Now, after a few good hurricane years, the coastal hard market is waning (more like collapsing) and WC rates are free-falling again. Reinsurance and windstorm writing are also bound up in much broader political matters, of course. I wonder how much of the new windstorm capacity is related to the impaired mortgage-backed securities…it is all related, Slim. That’s why we call it reality.
So actually, Hunter’s behavior has not been entirely market averse–to the contrary. He is just now playing his role as consumer advocate arguing to force personal lines rates down through political action. This is an entirely normal and expectable event–except perhaps in Putin’s Russia or in current China.
The economics of insurance underwriting cycles are never going to be understood widely so they will always remain a target for political action by either party as required to gain or maintain political power. (Hey, Slim, read Machiavelli’s The Prince or is that outside the approved insurance thought curriculum?). I am happy to see consumer advocates oppose Big Capital and its lap dog politicians–it wouldn’t be a good country without them.
The big picture, Slim–it’s called connecting the dots, ask Condi and Cheney and Bush–is that this government no longer represents or serves its people. Hey, even Lou Dobbs figured this one out. You seem to like that. Go figure. Too much sun on the brain in Arizona? Would Barry Goldwater recognize these “conservatives?”
Oh, well, I’ll just take your adivce and complete this worksheet to justify the IRPM and schedule credits that are needed to take this or that account away from someone else. Nothing like productive economic activity is there? Defoliating a victory garden sure works up an appetite!
Right on brother Chad!
Oh, so now it is against the law to make an excessive profit? Or is it just because insurance is regulated. I guess we are all going to jail? It will be crowded in there with all the Dr’s, hospital admin, Oil execs, trial attorneys, & government contractors.
You can’t say lickspittle.
The question is if there will be a middle class if the entitlement politics of the democrats get into power. Sorry, I know this is not relevant to the article but I see the American dream of achieving financial independence being eroded away by the entitlement attitude too many “American’s” now have.
After 40 years in the insurance industry I still don’t understand why it is believed to be a not for profit business.
You have been out of circulation a long time Media Mogul. Someone turn over your rock? You, Rosie and a few other nutters wouldn’t know how to keep a business in business for a month. Rosie, I know your posts are intended as jokes, but the joke is quite stale. Find a new place to bore people. Speaking of jokes, Robert Hunter is back and speaking nonsense.
Obviously, we are pleased to settle without costly and lengthy litigation,” said State Farm spokesman Fraser Engerman. He declined to comment further because terms of the settlement are confidential.
Documents and testimony that Bloomington, Ill.-based State Farm produced in previous court cases put clients in a good negotiating position, said William F. “Chip” Merlin, the policyholders’ attorney.
The material from State Farm officials indicated the company decided not to pay claims in areas hit by the storm surge, relying on policy language to deny claims without thorough investigations, Merlin said.
In cases in which wind and water combined to cause a loss, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled policy language precludes coverage.
However, Merlin said last week that does not relieve insurance companies of their duty under Mississippi law to fully investigate the cause of a loss and pay for wind damage covered under an all-perils policy
C’mon now, you know Rosie makes her comments & then abandons the site by putting her head back in the sand. She doesn’t revisit to see what we all have to compliment her on….thoughtful, reasoned blogging. At least we know one village has an idiot (or two?).
Hunter is leading an educational group to explain the basic economic rule of caveat emptor. Thanks CFA for pointing out that insurance companies are out to make a profit.
Where it gets stupid is… when he and cronies expect the insurance companies and regulators to pay his type by the attorney hour to provide this information.