What kind of discourse do you see with post #1 and #2? Is there any profanity in those posts? Do you disagree with those posts and demand they be removed because of disagreement? I think you are smarter than just saying they have discouse, I think you have the brains to get into specifics. Do you think you intelligent enough to respond?
Yea Rosie!! There you are girl!! Do you know how much you were missed? I sure hope you kept all the IJ\’s so you can read the posts in support of you!! Welcome Back!!
Rick, I\’m not sure I understood your latest query, but let me be clarify once again.
I am appealing to the editors of this site to moderate and/or delete posts which are not related to the article. I\’m not demanding, quite the opposite, rather I\’m suggesting that very nature of these unrelated posts will, eventually, make the IJ Insurance Headlines service unattractive to potential advertisers. Better yet, I would like to see active involvement by moderators who could challenge posters regularly. This isn’t censorship, but even if it was, what could we do about it…it’s a private website. Rick, what I’m suggesting is regularly occurring on website and forums all over the internet and for good reason…it makes good business sense. (see Washington Post which has well documented history of comment thread management).
You might think I\’m wrong on this point, and that’s fine. But I think I’ve been pretty clear and consistent.
We have updated our privacy policy to be more clear and meet the new requirements of the GDPR. By continuing to use our site, you accept our revised Privacy Policy.
What kind of discourse do you see with post #1 and #2? Is there any profanity in those posts? Do you disagree with those posts and demand they be removed because of disagreement? I think you are smarter than just saying they have discouse, I think you have the brains to get into specifics. Do you think you intelligent enough to respond?
Yea Rosie!! There you are girl!! Do you know how much you were missed? I sure hope you kept all the IJ\’s so you can read the posts in support of you!! Welcome Back!!
Rick, I\’m not sure I understood your latest query, but let me be clarify once again.
I am appealing to the editors of this site to moderate and/or delete posts which are not related to the article. I\’m not demanding, quite the opposite, rather I\’m suggesting that very nature of these unrelated posts will, eventually, make the IJ Insurance Headlines service unattractive to potential advertisers. Better yet, I would like to see active involvement by moderators who could challenge posters regularly. This isn’t censorship, but even if it was, what could we do about it…it’s a private website. Rick, what I’m suggesting is regularly occurring on website and forums all over the internet and for good reason…it makes good business sense. (see Washington Post which has well documented history of comment thread management).
You might think I\’m wrong on this point, and that’s fine. But I think I’ve been pretty clear and consistent.
post #3 which is typical of the discourse that occurs so regularly on these IJ stories really chaps my hide.
Once again, it is my opinion IJ risks credibility and ad revenue by allowing comments not cogent to the story.
It\’s my way or the highway suckers. Sorry but that\’s how I roll….