Maybe we could just do away with comprehensive policies and have only named peril policies, that way if the peril is not named, it\’s not covered. Make the covered peril language very specific, exclusions not needed.
Aw shucks, that would be just too simple.
all ah know iz there aint no ways dem insurer companeez can fit all dem xclooshuns on de front of ma pallicee. So, day will haf ta deside witch wons dey want to keep; ya kno, da wons dats most valuabul to dem, an let de odders go cuz day wont gonna fit dem all on dat won page.
Seez, dis iz part of my jeanus plan to forse carrierz to cuver more dan day do now, an I will make shur we make law dat dont let dem raise any rates on us, eder. Lets just see dem try an fit all dem xclueshunz on dat one page; it will haf to be a pretty big dag gum page, iffin ya know whut ah meen.
This trikin printin thingamajig reminds me of how polarized we are, we gots the pro-water flood insurers against the pro-winddamage pay me cuz I had insurance folk; it reminds of of the wal-mart vs union, Iraq war vs surrenderers, vegietariens vs carnievors, and even right vs left…Trent vs not Trent…even
reminds me of government; gridlock that is; you got the reds hatin\’ the blues, and the blues hatin\’ the reds; dat\’s why nuttin\’ gets done in Washington; it\’s like the big fish and the little fish; the big fish wants to eat, and the little fish wants to eat, but the big fish wants to eat the little fish, and the little fish doesn\’t want to be eat. See, that\’s like government. What we need is universal flood coverage; put a $500k cap on it, but a 15% deductible; that way you makes flood people take responsibility for some of their loss, but you can provide coverage to the really well off people like me who need extra coverage for their beach property. That, and we should tax gas 50 cents per gallon on top of the current taxes to balance the budget. Then you make the print real small, except fir dat first page, yaz make it\’z real big and people justs reads dat page and dey stop right dare.
That term sounds simple enough to me? I guess big words like \”exclusion\” are too difficult for the Senator? Why, yes Senator, noncoverage disclosure makes so much more sense. Thank you for clarifying.
….why Senator Lott has problems with the convoluted legalese of the \”Simplified\” Homeowners insurance policies now in use. He got his law degree from the University of Mississippi (see his bio)!!!
Dubya don\’t talk too good. Daddy\’s VP can\’t spell potato\”e\”. Barbara is pushing reading is fundamental.
I say while we are all following Dubya\’s advice and putting \”food on our families,\” we throw some on our insurance policies too. Maybe we\’ll actually read a few of the words while we are gobbling them all down before we lose our sight to obesity and Type II diabetes-induced blindness.
Gee, do we see some clues here about the state of our nation? Nah!! Hey, the big NCAA game is on–pass me a beer…maybe I can forget all these troubles…
We have updated our privacy policy to be more clear and meet the new requirements of the GDPR. By continuing to use our site, you accept our revised Privacy Policy.
Maybe we could just do away with comprehensive policies and have only named peril policies, that way if the peril is not named, it\’s not covered. Make the covered peril language very specific, exclusions not needed.
Aw shucks, that would be just too simple.
all ah know iz there aint no ways dem insurer companeez can fit all dem xclooshuns on de front of ma pallicee. So, day will haf ta deside witch wons dey want to keep; ya kno, da wons dats most valuabul to dem, an let de odders go cuz day wont gonna fit dem all on dat won page.
Seez, dis iz part of my jeanus plan to forse carrierz to cuver more dan day do now, an I will make shur we make law dat dont let dem raise any rates on us, eder. Lets just see dem try an fit all dem xclueshunz on dat one page; it will haf to be a pretty big dag gum page, iffin ya know whut ah meen.
This trikin printin thingamajig reminds me of how polarized we are, we gots the pro-water flood insurers against the pro-winddamage pay me cuz I had insurance folk; it reminds of of the wal-mart vs union, Iraq war vs surrenderers, vegietariens vs carnievors, and even right vs left…Trent vs not Trent…even
reminds me of government; gridlock that is; you got the reds hatin\’ the blues, and the blues hatin\’ the reds; dat\’s why nuttin\’ gets done in Washington; it\’s like the big fish and the little fish; the big fish wants to eat, and the little fish wants to eat, but the big fish wants to eat the little fish, and the little fish doesn\’t want to be eat. See, that\’s like government. What we need is universal flood coverage; put a $500k cap on it, but a 15% deductible; that way you makes flood people take responsibility for some of their loss, but you can provide coverage to the really well off people like me who need extra coverage for their beach property. That, and we should tax gas 50 cents per gallon on top of the current taxes to balance the budget. Then you make the print real small, except fir dat first page, yaz make it\’z real big and people justs reads dat page and dey stop right dare.
Ha,ha, most insurance professional don\’t even understand the coverage, with all the exclusions and exceptions and what ifs!
Please direct a question to Trent Lott, did you ever read your homeowners policy yes or no. If its no he lied.
How come Sen. Lott got paid on his claim and I did not? Seems to me like he already knew what exclusion meant but bent the rules to not apply to HIM!
That term sounds simple enough to me? I guess big words like \”exclusion\” are too difficult for the Senator? Why, yes Senator, noncoverage disclosure makes so much more sense. Thank you for clarifying.
….why Senator Lott has problems with the convoluted legalese of the \”Simplified\” Homeowners insurance policies now in use. He got his law degree from the University of Mississippi (see his bio)!!!
Dubya don\’t talk too good. Daddy\’s VP can\’t spell potato\”e\”. Barbara is pushing reading is fundamental.
I say while we are all following Dubya\’s advice and putting \”food on our families,\” we throw some on our insurance policies too. Maybe we\’ll actually read a few of the words while we are gobbling them all down before we lose our sight to obesity and Type II diabetes-induced blindness.
Gee, do we see some clues here about the state of our nation? Nah!! Hey, the big NCAA game is on–pass me a beer…maybe I can forget all these troubles…
Heck, why should anyone learn to read, then they wouldn\’t be able to play sports!