The Michigan Supreme Court has ruled in favor of insurance companies in two cases that involve drivers who crashed cars when they didn’t have the owners’ permission to get behind the wheel.
The court’s Republican majority said Tuesday the drivers don’t qualify for insurance benefits, even if they weren’t stealing the cars.
The court ruled in a case from Kent County where a man crashed his father’s car. Craig Smith Jr.’s girlfriend was driving but he talked her into letting him take over, despite not having a license.
A second case from Ottawa County involved a man who was excluded from his wife’s insurance policy. He drove the car anyway and crashed.
The Supreme Court overruled decisions by the state appeals court, which said the drivers were eligible for benefits.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Americans Are Inundated With Scams. Why Do So Few Victims Report Them?
California and US West Threatened by Wildfires Over Coming Days
Flood Insurance Gap Will Squeeze Local Governments and Homeowners, Moody’s Says
AI Is Reshaping Insurance: What Claims Pros and Lawyers Must Know Now