$17M Jury Award Against American Family Mutual Reinstated

May 6, 2009

  • May 11, 2009 at 3:39 am
    Wade Ebert says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Seriously?

    Since it appears you don’t know how to work Google – Perhaps this will help.

    http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Wade+Ebert+American+Auto+Body&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&oq=

    Many things for you to read there. I also encourage you to hire an attorney with whom you can consult and to read your state laws. Beyond that – To perhaps take a business law class, if not that, a real estate qualification test – that experiance will teach you an awful lot about “duty” to the consumer and basic “tort” and “contract” law.

    I got most of my experience with the legal aspects of our industry by studying under an attorney (Patrick J. McGuire) who, on retainer provided monthly curricula and review for groups of repairers in our state.

    I also was involved in my Father’s successful litigation against State Farm insurance when he owned the shop. During and after that I was an expert witness in several aftermarket parts and diminished value cases.

    I currently provide investigative services for attorneys amassing data regarding damage analysis and poor repairs.

    I have worked directly with the Office of the Attorney General in our state on legislation written mostly by Mr. Pierson that was passed into law – and continue to work for enforcement of the consumer protection elements of same.

    I have testified before several committees in both the House and Senate Chambers.

    I am currently and have in the past, been consulted independently by several states’ associations on matters of legislation and regulation.

    I recently worked with OH attorney Erica Eversman in the development of the Model Code of Ethics which has been released to all state associations for implementation in their states.

    There has always been a vacuum in this industry – which the lowest common denomiator has rushed in to fill. It is time we elevated the LCD.

    I think if you would read more industry centric magazines and perhaps participate in an association you would be amazed at just how many people have (finally) come to know what I do.

    I know I work for the Vehicle Owner.

    I know the Attorney General knows I do too.

    I know that “claims handling”, “negotiating”, and “representation” are not what I or anyone else can do legally – unless they are an attorney. I know what insurers do does not really concern me or how I repair the car – since I don’t work for them.

    I know the understanding of these concepts seems completely foreign and uncomfortable and I know the understanding took years to soak in. Now I get calls from attorneys to help them understand – and I know I’ve done it right when they call me back and say something like “You know? You are right – the way things have been influenced by insurers, I just haven’t thought about it that way since they let me out of law school.”

    Read something and contact me with any questions you may have. Maybe you’ll find what others have – a new way to look at an old business.

    If you are near and want to pick my brain in public – I’ve been invited and I’ll be speaking to a group of repairers on the IL side of the river just northeast of Saint Louis tomorrow night.

  • May 12, 2009 at 10:17 am
    Wade Ebert says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Ahhh don’t go… I always have such fun bringing reality to the terminally dim and the serial liars who tend to gravitate to and take advantage of them.

    The fact remains that Snider/Avery was reversed by a Judge who was placed by State Farm money. It isn’t my opinion – it is fact, it made all of the news and all of the legal journals as well. Heck I bet eve the Insurance Journal Archive has a huge section devoted to it. A verdict purchased – simple as that. That’s alright Patrick Fitzgerald isn’t anywhere near done with his work.

    Just so you get the story straight. The IL Sumpreme Court Verdict had it’s base in the non uniformity of policies – state by state. Their evading the lower court’s finding of fact – wasn’t about whether the parts are or have even been “at least equal in terms of fit quality and performance.” it was about the differences between the each states’ State Farm insurance policies. What that set up was a similar challenge in each of the fifty states one at a time.

    Hey you never did tell me what state you are in. If you do I’ll tell you whether you are next on Ms. Syverson’s list. ;) You’d make an excellent witness for the defense.

    Words of advice – you cannot “delete” me from a website over which you have no control (unless of course there is some kind of super computer genius under all of those sentence fragments and flawed logic) – And, perhaps you ought not to drink and post. Even the insurance folks are embarassed for you now.

    Have a nice day.

  • October 26, 2009 at 2:08 am
    Dave says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I think everyone should look at the number of times which state are you in.In Ohio,Am(counterfeit parts have to be approved by the vehicl;e owner. If 1st party they do not have to pay a difference. Ohio law states the vehicle is to be returned to its condition before the loss. State law controls their use in Ohio. Start your change there.ORC1345.81
    read it…..

  • December 9, 2009 at 8:34 am
    Chris Clarke says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    What a surprise to find you, Wade and Mark name calling on another site. What an idiot!



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*