New York’s top court has rejected some malpractice damage claims against defense lawyers by the people they represent unsuccessfully, concluding that allowing them could have “devastating consequences” for the criminal justice system.
The Court of Appeals unanimously says allowing damages for lost liberty and emotional distress would have “a chilling effect” on an already strapped defense bar in representing poor defendants and give them an incentive to not help with appeals.
The case stems from Thomas Dombrowski’s attempted rape conviction in Allegany County. He spent five years in jail. A federal judge vacated his conviction, ruling that errors by defense lawyer Raymond Bulson made it hard for the jury to assess the accuser’s credibility.
Dombrowksi sued Bulson.
The court says defendants can still sue for monetary damages like lost wages.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Zillow Loses Antitrust Battle Over Chicago Area Listing Feed
Warren Presses Insurance Watchdogs for Answers Amid Walter Probe
New Corgi, Liberate, VERVE Claims Tech. Do We Need New Acronyms?
The Big Data/AI ‘Revolution’ Is Driving Up Verdicts, Settlements as Plaintiffs Buy In