Geeeeeze – she’s all disappointed over a 10% difference (30 over 300). Unless this procedure was done as a reconstruction following a bilateral mastectomy, just wrong to use Federal Vet’s facility. In Las Vegas it would matter, in Virginia nobody cares
We have updated our privacy policy to be more clear and meet the new requirements of the GDPR. By continuing to use our site, you accept our revised Privacy Policy.
Are you kidding me? We are tying up military hospitals for this crap?? And then she turns and sues?? Your tax dollars at work.
Geeeeeze – she’s all disappointed over a 10% difference (30 over 300). Unless this procedure was done as a reconstruction following a bilateral mastectomy, just wrong to use Federal Vet’s facility. In Las Vegas it would matter, in Virginia nobody cares
Hey what is 30 cubic centimeters among friends? 270 is nothing to sneeze at.
Would the legal term be “under-tittified” ?
Just a tit for tat lawsuit.
What a boob!!! This is NOT an effective way of wasting my tax dollars.
I am so embarrassed to live in Virginia. Where they would allow this to be published in the newpaper. So sorry world!!!!!!!