New Jersey’s Supreme Court has denied a drive-by shooting victim’s attempt to have her car insurer reimburse her under uninsured motorist coverage.
Camie Livsey was leaving a grocery store in Irvington four years ago when she was shot.
Witnesses saw an older Toyota speeding from the scene, though it was not determined if the shots were fired from the car.
Livsey’s claim was denied by Mercury Insurance. Livsey sued Mercury, saying it was reasonable to expect a drive-by shooting in a high-crime area could involve an uninsured motorist.
An appeals court had reversed a trial judge’s ruling against Livsey.
The Supreme Court ruled by a 4-3 majority to uphold the trial judge’s decision.
Livsey’s attorney didn’t return an Associated Press call seeking comment on Thursday.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Isaias: 47,000 Claims and $582M in Losses in Florida So Far, OIR Reports
Meta to Pay Historic $25 Billion in New Mexico Deception Case
Psychological Reactance: The Hidden Bias in Claims Negotiation
Recovery Starts Before the Loss: What Claims Professionals Know About Severe Weather Preparedness