Basic pltf theory is that low or no blood pressure either compromised the optic nerves or the occipital lobe of the brain (where the vision ‘center’ is located) sounds like ‘junk’ science to me and a very gullible jury
I hope the appeal is successful. Sounds like an auto claim my client is dealing with. The plaintiff alleges he is now sterile from an auto accident. Good grief!
I’m wondering why he didn’t name the anesthesiologist (who would be responsible for blood products, etc). I doubt blindness was something in the informed consent discussion (because its so rare as to be virtually unheard of). Even the anesthesiologist would be likely defensible; I’m wondering just what plaintiffs expert actually told the jury about standard of care!
We have updated our privacy policy to be more clear and meet the new requirements of the GDPR. By continuing to use our site, you accept our revised Privacy Policy.
Basic pltf theory is that low or no blood pressure either compromised the optic nerves or the occipital lobe of the brain (where the vision ‘center’ is located) sounds like ‘junk’ science to me and a very gullible jury
I hope the appeal is successful. Sounds like an auto claim my client is dealing with. The plaintiff alleges he is now sterile from an auto accident. Good grief!
I’m wondering why he didn’t name the anesthesiologist (who would be responsible for blood products, etc). I doubt blindness was something in the informed consent discussion (because its so rare as to be virtually unheard of). Even the anesthesiologist would be likely defensible; I’m wondering just what plaintiffs expert actually told the jury about standard of care!