Stu,
Thanks for the laugh! I just saw the third article over the news wire. Unfortunately, the patient developed infections in both legs that required amputation of both just below the hip joint.
The judge granted defendants motion for summary judgement citing that the plaintiff, legally, did not have a leg to stand on. I hate when that happens!
well, we seem to appear to have a foot pending situation. it appears that one fella asked for help w/his one foot instead is getting help w/both feet. now, as far as good news and bad news — LOL — why not say that he saved a bunch of money on his car insurance! but back to the issue…truly, the podiatrist does have a leg to stand on but will be a bit less nimble w/no feet or foot! i thought that prior to the surgery, does not the surgeon go over the situation prior to the actual surgery that day? i know they did when my wife had problems w/her foot. i like the idea of an earlier posts, where they amply put words on the wrong foot! i hope that the VA will at least pay for both operations since they still have to fix the other foot. and for those who keep blaming BUSH, relax, i never knew that he was the podiatrist surgeon! for that matter, let’s blame capitol hill and all those rich senators and house of representatives. blaming them is like blaming them for the issue of walter reed hospital. when in reality, blame starts at the root of the problem – the surgeon!
Foot the bill? Leg to stand on? Hammer toe clause? Foot loose? How much more obvious, therefore not funny, can you be? How is it okay for you to criticize me for ragging on Stu, but not ok for me to rag on Stu? Yeah, how’s that feel? Guess the shoe is on the other foot now!
We have updated our privacy policy to be more clear and meet the new requirements of the GDPR. By continuing to use our site, you accept our revised Privacy Policy.
Stu,
If you are gonna put up ridiculous posts, at least make sure they are funny.
LOL !! Stu, that was a good one! Good to have you back!!
Good one Stu….Mitch, you seem a little foot loose with your comments today.
Mitch, are you related to Rosie? Lighten up. Lifes too short to be so uptight. Keep um coming, Stu.
Stu,
Thanks for the laugh! I just saw the third article over the news wire. Unfortunately, the patient developed infections in both legs that required amputation of both just below the hip joint.
The judge granted defendants motion for summary judgement citing that the plaintiff, legally, did not have a leg to stand on. I hate when that happens!
well, we seem to appear to have a foot pending situation. it appears that one fella asked for help w/his one foot instead is getting help w/both feet. now, as far as good news and bad news — LOL — why not say that he saved a bunch of money on his car insurance! but back to the issue…truly, the podiatrist does have a leg to stand on but will be a bit less nimble w/no feet or foot! i thought that prior to the surgery, does not the surgeon go over the situation prior to the actual surgery that day? i know they did when my wife had problems w/her foot. i like the idea of an earlier posts, where they amply put words on the wrong foot! i hope that the VA will at least pay for both operations since they still have to fix the other foot. and for those who keep blaming BUSH, relax, i never knew that he was the podiatrist surgeon! for that matter, let’s blame capitol hill and all those rich senators and house of representatives. blaming them is like blaming them for the issue of walter reed hospital. when in reality, blame starts at the root of the problem – the surgeon!
Foot the bill? Leg to stand on? Hammer toe clause? Foot loose? How much more obvious, therefore not funny, can you be? How is it okay for you to criticize me for ragging on Stu, but not ok for me to rag on Stu? Yeah, how’s that feel? Guess the shoe is on the other foot now!
I agree with Mitch – Stu’s attempt at a joke was L.A.M.E. don’t quit your day job sweetheart.
It’s OK to joke around and laugh once in a while…….What is your favorite movie–“The Grinch that Stole Christmas”??
yes, by all means, joke around…but YOUR JOKE WAS NOT FUNNY.