Colorado Supreme Court: Employer Must Pay Suspended Workers’ Comp

May 16, 2008

  • May 16, 2008 at 2:03 am
    Max says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Go figure…we are bogged down in syntax. But then if we all agreed on the definition of “is” upfront, we’d have no need for lawyers.

  • May 16, 2008 at 5:59 am
    tyler bursey says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    The question should be what took her so long to see the doctor again after the missed appointment. She missed the first appointment in March but didn’t attend the next meeting until June! She waited too long, she shouldn’t get the benifits while she wasted the time.

  • May 22, 2008 at 6:37 am
    johnny says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    what a bogus ruling. can’t this be appealed? Why does the liability of the employee matter in a WC claim? I thought WC is a given to the employee regardless of liability. Someone care to enlighten me? Thanks.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*