NO THANKS – she is the real definition of an opinionated wench that has had to much time to listen to a bunch of opinionated men & has just enough sense to form sentences of the words she\’s heard…
If she really believes that crap that spews through her lips she will get hers one day, hey we all will get it, what is due us that is & she is racking up some pretty hefty dues!
so you are saying the liberials who support gay and lesbian agendas, banned public prayer in schools, want \”in God we trust\” taken off money, want drugs legalized, want pornography on every street corner are following Jesus–well maam I think the devil has twisted your thought process!
School prayer is unconstitutional. The Establishment Clause of the First Amendment provides that government shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion. Because public schools are government funded, prayer led by school officials or incorporated into the school routine amounts to government-established religion.
School prayer violates the “separation of church and state.” Although this phrase is not found in the U.S. Constitution, it is an accepted principle of American law providing that the government cannot interfere in the practices of the church nor advance or advocate religious observances in government settings.
Public schools are intended for education, not religious observance or proselytization.
Prayer is school is already legal. Students are already allowed to pray on a voluntary basis (in a non-disruptive way) so formal school prayer is unnecessary.
School prayer may lead to intolerance. Public prayer will highlight religious differences of which students may have been unaware. Those students who abstain from school prayer or protest against it may be ostracized.
School prayer is inherently coercive and cannot be implemented in a way that is truly voluntary. What young child could regard prayer as voluntary where it is lead by his teacher, incorporated into the school routine and engaged in by the majority of his peers?
The public school system is created for all students and supported by all taxpayers. It should therefore remain neutral on religious issues over which students and taxpayers will differ.
Since no formal school prayer could simultaneously honor and uphold the tenets of the many religions practiced in the U.S., as well as various denominational differences, prayer is better left in the home and religious institution of the individual student’s choice. A related argument is that school prayer usurps the role of parents and religious institutions who desire to provide religious instruction in keeping with their own beliefs.
Source: allabouthistory.org
Ann Colter is a man in sheeps clothing. Ever looked at that adam\’s apple?
Democrats know Republican\’s look up to them as Gods. But please, do not worship us.
Which God should we ask our school children pray to? Alah? or maybe a Devil
Also, I bet some of our troops who were sent to Iraq looking for weapons of mass destruction whose existence the current President lied to us about, would have also enjoyed yesterday\’s football game.
Although there is no such thing as a \”gay agenda\” I would rather have an agenda like theirs than your \”christian\” agenda that promotes unequality, hatred and bigotry. Ann seems to follow and promote such a \”christian\” agenda as well.
It\’s a cell phone that caught fire – supposedly – where did all these comments come from? Is there no other forum that will allow you folks to discuss these feelings of inadequacy that you are raving about?
Ann Coulter has a weekly article. She is an extremely intelligent woman who only cites the facts. Amazing how threatened liberals are by her. Must be because they don\’t ever want to hear logical, intelligent arguments against their unbacked \”facts.\” In fact, the arguments against her in this thread are sooo \”Jerry Springer.\”
Of Course, you are right, but we must stop this message of hate mongering by the Republican party. They are why our Country is in such peril and why we cannot allow any opportunity to pass that allows their message of hate & bigotry continue. Even a simple forum such as this must not allow them to continue their rhetoric.
We have updated our privacy policy to be more clear and meet the new requirements of the GDPR. By continuing to use our site, you accept our revised Privacy Policy.
NO THANKS – she is the real definition of an opinionated wench that has had to much time to listen to a bunch of opinionated men & has just enough sense to form sentences of the words she\’s heard…
If she really believes that crap that spews through her lips she will get hers one day, hey we all will get it, what is due us that is & she is racking up some pretty hefty dues!
so you are saying the liberials who support gay and lesbian agendas, banned public prayer in schools, want \”in God we trust\” taken off money, want drugs legalized, want pornography on every street corner are following Jesus–well maam I think the devil has twisted your thought process!
Um, what Liberals want pornography on every street corner..the Quakers?…The Unitarian Universalists?…Why do you vilify people you know nothing about?
School prayer is unconstitutional. The Establishment Clause of the First Amendment provides that government shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion. Because public schools are government funded, prayer led by school officials or incorporated into the school routine amounts to government-established religion.
School prayer violates the “separation of church and state.” Although this phrase is not found in the U.S. Constitution, it is an accepted principle of American law providing that the government cannot interfere in the practices of the church nor advance or advocate religious observances in government settings.
Public schools are intended for education, not religious observance or proselytization.
Prayer is school is already legal. Students are already allowed to pray on a voluntary basis (in a non-disruptive way) so formal school prayer is unnecessary.
School prayer may lead to intolerance. Public prayer will highlight religious differences of which students may have been unaware. Those students who abstain from school prayer or protest against it may be ostracized.
School prayer is inherently coercive and cannot be implemented in a way that is truly voluntary. What young child could regard prayer as voluntary where it is lead by his teacher, incorporated into the school routine and engaged in by the majority of his peers?
The public school system is created for all students and supported by all taxpayers. It should therefore remain neutral on religious issues over which students and taxpayers will differ.
Since no formal school prayer could simultaneously honor and uphold the tenets of the many religions practiced in the U.S., as well as various denominational differences, prayer is better left in the home and religious institution of the individual student’s choice. A related argument is that school prayer usurps the role of parents and religious institutions who desire to provide religious instruction in keeping with their own beliefs.
Source: allabouthistory.org
Ann Colter is a man in sheeps clothing. Ever looked at that adam\’s apple?
Democrats know Republican\’s look up to them as Gods. But please, do not worship us.
Which God should we ask our school children pray to? Alah? or maybe a Devil
Also, I bet some of our troops who were sent to Iraq looking for weapons of mass destruction whose existence the current President lied to us about, would have also enjoyed yesterday\’s football game.
Although there is no such thing as a \”gay agenda\” I would rather have an agenda like theirs than your \”christian\” agenda that promotes unequality, hatred and bigotry. Ann seems to follow and promote such a \”christian\” agenda as well.
It\’s a cell phone that caught fire – supposedly – where did all these comments come from? Is there no other forum that will allow you folks to discuss these feelings of inadequacy that you are raving about?
Paul,
Ann Coulter has a weekly article. She is an extremely intelligent woman who only cites the facts. Amazing how threatened liberals are by her. Must be because they don\’t ever want to hear logical, intelligent arguments against their unbacked \”facts.\” In fact, the arguments against her in this thread are sooo \”Jerry Springer.\”
I believe in Christ however the use of \”Christianity\” as a scare tactic by the Republican party is loathsome.
Of Course, you are right, but we must stop this message of hate mongering by the Republican party. They are why our Country is in such peril and why we cannot allow any opportunity to pass that allows their message of hate & bigotry continue. Even a simple forum such as this must not allow them to continue their rhetoric.