Julianna said it right. A condo owners policy was available to Walket and Williams The liability on that policy would have protected them but they chose not to purchase and now they are looking for deep pocket. There were never an insured/ insurer relationship between willaims/Walker and Farmers.
This case was litigated in Los Angeles. The Condo Assn policy was to have covered these two women for any liability which occurred in the “common areas.” Farmers loses $9 million and 100,000 more customers. Name one other company that sues it’s own policyholders, or is sued by it’s own employees. Farmers is the worst. http://finance.lycos.com/qc/news/story.aspx?symbols=BWIRE:100&story=200507152246_BWR__BW5551
You think the company created the mold crisis? I think it is our legal system. Judges mostly. They’ve been out of touch with reality for a long time.
Folks need to realize that s*** happens. Sometimes bad things happen to good people, and there isn’t always someone with which to place the blame. Be glad no one died.
NO ! She’s wrong one of the most important coverage’s within an Condo Association policy is LIABILITY FOR COMMON AREA period ! HO-6 policy, only covers condo premise under the care and control of the named insured
NO ! She’s wrong one of the most important coverage’s within an Condo Association policy is LIABILITY FOR COMMON AREA period ! HO-6 policy, only covers condo premise under the care and control of the named insured. NOT OUTSIDE THE PREMISE…..Farmer agent go back to a real ins school.
We have updated our privacy policy to be more clear and meet the new requirements of the GDPR. By continuing to use our site, you accept our revised Privacy Policy.
Julianna said it right. A condo owners policy was available to Walket and Williams The liability on that policy would have protected them but they chose not to purchase and now they are looking for deep pocket. There were never an insured/ insurer relationship between willaims/Walker and Farmers.
Where is the jurisdiction for the verdict? Washington? New Mexico? Idaho? Hawaii?
This case was litigated in Los Angeles. The Condo Assn policy was to have covered these two women for any liability which occurred in the “common areas.” Farmers loses $9 million and 100,000 more customers. Name one other company that sues it’s own policyholders, or is sued by it’s own employees. Farmers is the worst.
http://finance.lycos.com/qc/news/story.aspx?symbols=BWIRE:100&story=200507152246_BWR__BW5551
This is the same company that created a mold crisis when they refused to address the Ballard’s concerns in TX.
sounds like another o j jury to me or a shark attorney saw some deep pocket sense when do companys cover people that don’t buy there own insurance
You think the company created the mold crisis? I think it is our legal system. Judges mostly. They’ve been out of touch with reality for a long time.
Folks need to realize that s*** happens. Sometimes bad things happen to good people, and there isn’t always someone with which to place the blame. Be glad no one died.
Get over it or get therapy.
NO ! She’s wrong one of the most important coverage’s within an Condo Association policy is LIABILITY FOR COMMON AREA period ! HO-6 policy, only covers condo premise under the care and control of the named insured
NO ! She’s wrong one of the most important coverage’s within an Condo Association policy is LIABILITY FOR COMMON AREA period ! HO-6 policy, only covers condo premise under the care and control of the named insured. NOT OUTSIDE THE PREMISE…..Farmer agent go back to a real ins school.
After reading that ridiculously illegible post, now I know why FORMER FARMERS AGENT is no longer employed.