Tennessee High Court Hears Botched Home Repair Case

September 6, 2011

  • September 6, 2011 at 3:03 pm
    Jester says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 2
    Thumb down 0

    Liability should remain with the GC. He’s the one who is supposed to add value by knowing and vetting sub-contractors who work for him. All subs should be required to produce a certificate of insurance naming the GC as an additional insured. That’s the cost of doing business. The consumer has no control over the process and should not penalized.

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *