No More ‘Free Bite’ for Kentucky Dogs

November 4, 2009

  • November 5, 2009 at 1:12 am
    The Underground Adjuster says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    So, did the baboons get a free bite too?

  • November 4, 2009 at 1:56 am
    Barry says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Too bad this same logic does not apply to drunk drivers—usually after the 4th or 5th DWI a drunk has to start worrying abourt losing his/her license………

  • November 4, 2009 at 2:48 am
    Azekiel says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I’d like to meet the jackass who came up the “first bite is free” concept. A dog doesn’t have to be vicious to bite. It’s their nature. Attacks vs. bites should be treated differently.

  • November 5, 2009 at 1:00 am
    Lawyer says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Not sure what you’re saying exactly about attack vs. bite, but if you want to know where “every dog gets one free bite” came from, you’ll probably have to consult some early 17th century English law books and even then, they probably won’t identify a specific origin. It’s a truly ancient common law principle that remains in force in maybe about 20 states. The rest have codified dog bite laws.

    The real shame is the outright (and retroactive) prohibition on exotic animals. Seems like a knee-jerk reaction to a relatively limited problem.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*