Insurers Backing Away from Homes with Chinese Drywall

October 16, 2009

  • October 26, 2009 at 1:36 am
    J Doe says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    There is nothing in my background that triggers it; but I am offended by the use of language that is (at best) ignorant, and (at worst) offensive to people of that origin.

    I am not calling the authors of these comments racist; on the contrary, I think they make some very valid points. But I think that their use of the English language makes them appear ignorant and offensive.

    I would rather they leave out ethnicity and origin, and simply say “Chinese” or “arson for insurance”, instead of the inflammatory language which was employed.

  • October 26, 2009 at 6:55 am
    LARRY LOGIC says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Do you think that if we hold China’s bonds hostage, they might stop buying them, thus causing our financial house of cards to topple? Otherwise I agree!

  • October 27, 2009 at 4:14 am
    twittering bird says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I agree with the insurance companies on this one. This is a perfect example of the lack of consumer protection we have with imported products from China. Our gov’t should not allow products to come in unless they can provide us a copy of their products & completed operations coverage, or provide a warranty.

    This is outrageous. Oh, under what administration did this occur? The Chenney administration? Why am I not surprised.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*