Florida’s Tower Hill Insurance Downgraded by A.M. Best; Tower Hill Responds

August 27, 2009

  • August 27, 2009 at 2:41 am
    Citizen X says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I think it should be know that tower hill has over 400 employees. They have been around for close to 40 years and have survived storms such as Andrew and the havoc that the 2004/2005 seasons brought to the state. There are here alive and well, and arent running away like many companies before them and those who cant take the wind in the future. This agent will be selling Tower till the cows come home.

  • August 27, 2009 at 2:42 am
    Mr. Solvent says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Are you out of your mind? Have you ever read a contract from some of these non-admitted carriers? Some of the exclusions and special provisions are enough to boggle the mind.

    As far as E&O goes, that’s a disaster of a whole other nature. There are some E&O carriers who don’t mind what carriers you represent. Many of those carriers exclude carrier solvency.

  • August 27, 2009 at 2:45 am
    scott says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Right on, Mr Solvent! I agree completely. Writing this non-admitted home business is risky!

  • August 27, 2009 at 4:16 am
    Bernie says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    THIG may have made the right move provided the reinsurance carrier is a strong reinsurer.

  • August 27, 2009 at 4:33 am
    GV Fan says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    What exclusions are you talking about? I know there are some sinkhole limitations, but what else are you talking about? I have read the contract and it looks pretty good (and standard) to me.

  • August 27, 2009 at 4:42 am
    saiai2001 says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I write Geovera as well as THIG. The first unusual limitation which comes to mind is the “roof coverage limitation” of $5,000 which applies if more than one layer of roofing over-layment exists. I am sure there are others but I don’t have the policy form handy.

  • August 27, 2009 at 4:45 am
    SWFL Agent says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    THIG, is fine. Which rating is better? A “D” from A.M. Best or an “A” from Demotech for a carrier that couln’t even get a return phone call from A.M Best.

  • August 27, 2009 at 4:59 am
    Charley Crissed says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    This whole thing is making me nervous about Tower Hill. Are they really making the financial sacrifice for reinsurance so that they can pay claims should we get hit with a storm as part of good service; or are they just financially strapped. Poe had a lot of good arguments on their financial stability before they went under.
    Tower Hill is a great organization. Hopefully they will weather this storm. (Pun intended)

  • August 28, 2009 at 8:22 am
    Don B says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Is Royal Palm part of Tower Hill?

    Are they affected?

  • August 28, 2009 at 9:11 am
    Mr. Solvent says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    The $5,000 roof limitation is also one of the GeoVera limitations I was thinking of. If you think it’s a standard contract I would hate to be your E&O carrier.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*