what how many other used the glue of the past years? it has to be more than 4! i am suprised that more folks have not gotten involved in this. what is the percentage of folks that have used the product? what is the possibility that they are using the producting incorrectly while everyone else has? something wrong w/this picture.
wudchuck………..Are you “intellectually challenged” or are you just not able to piece together a coherent whole sentence?? Go back and read your comments and try to convince any of us you know what you are talking about.
When you adjust a claim, do you give demerits for poor penmanship? Or do you give a basic 5 points to someone who can spell their name properly?
Get with it, dinosaur. You understood what the man said but didn’t have a good enough rejoinder. Chuck was texting while working; go watch the average 6YO thumb thru life.
Two more idiots looking for a village…..come on guys….this isn’t texting, it’s just stupidity. I wasn’t looking for a “snappy rejoinder”. Just trying to figure out what “wudchuck” is saying. This isn’t his first attempt at communicating; just his worst attempt.
it says initially that the employees sued the company. then it states that 4 of them actually are recieving payments for damages. so where did the other folks or how many other folks are sueing and what compensation are they getting? because that fact is stating that 4 members are getting any compensation for damages incurrred.
sounds like the journalist did not write a complete story.
We have updated our privacy policy to be more clear and meet the new requirements of the GDPR. By continuing to use our site, you accept our revised Privacy Policy.
what how many other used the glue of the past years? it has to be more than 4! i am suprised that more folks have not gotten involved in this. what is the percentage of folks that have used the product? what is the possibility that they are using the producting incorrectly while everyone else has? something wrong w/this picture.
Wudie, there originally were 16 people involved, but 8 of them died from sniffing / huffing, and the other 4 got glued to the plaintiffs.
These four geniuses were probably sniffing the stuff for decades.
wudchuck………..Are you “intellectually challenged” or are you just not able to piece together a coherent whole sentence?? Go back and read your comments and try to convince any of us you know what you are talking about.
When you adjust a claim, do you give demerits for poor penmanship? Or do you give a basic 5 points to someone who can spell their name properly?
Get with it, dinosaur. You understood what the man said but didn’t have a good enough rejoinder. Chuck was texting while working; go watch the average 6YO thumb thru life.
Thanks Egg’s Benedict…
Two more idiots looking for a village…..come on guys….this isn’t texting, it’s just stupidity. I wasn’t looking for a “snappy rejoinder”. Just trying to figure out what “wudchuck” is saying. This isn’t his first attempt at communicating; just his worst attempt.
Move on, dudes!
Do you do this in face to face meetings? If so,do people ususlly speak to you a second time?? Or run from the room when they see you coming???
here’s the problem:
it says initially that the employees sued the company. then it states that 4 of them actually are recieving payments for damages. so where did the other folks or how many other folks are sueing and what compensation are they getting? because that fact is stating that 4 members are getting any compensation for damages incurrred.
sounds like the journalist did not write a complete story.
Thanks, wudchuck. That helps. And, yes, I agree that a lot of the stories on this site are either incomplete or misleading.
AGT: Yes, I would run from you because you sound like either a complete buffoon. Go change your diapers and whine somewhere else.