Federal Grand Jury in Miss. Seeks State Farm Transcript

October 1, 2006

  • October 2, 2006 at 8:21 am
    Skeptical says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Perhaps they found no hail damage because there was no hail damage! Most insureds and roofers want to believe that just because hail drops from the sky, the roof has hail damage.

  • October 2, 2006 at 3:27 am
    F. Hereford says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    We had a lot of trouble with this Haag outfit following a hail storm in St. Louis in May 2004. They were hired by one of our homeowners insurers and consistently seemed to find no hail damage at homes they inspected! We later had the declinations overturned but not until we went through considerable hassle. I believe the wronged insureds would have sued if they had had to.

  • January 13, 2007 at 5:33 am
    State Farm MS Homeowner says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    When my State Farm Adjuster told me that State Farm Refused to pay $1.oo because all of the damage was from water.
    I said that I would file a suit.
    The Adjuster said \”The Engineering Firm said it was all water\” and State Farm has more money than you and they have the best Lawyers too!
    I then asked….
    What is the Name of The Engineering Firm?
    He could and would not tell me.

    Lies from the very beginning and many ways to deny our claims.

    Months later I called to see if they would reconsider because I had a video as evidence.
    State Farm Rep called me to say
    My records do not show that an Engineering Firm or that One Engineer was ever at my home.
    My Response was: Sir, I know. It\’s the reason why I am complaining.
    Still my claim was denied again.

    American has to change.
    Be true to each other.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*