Texas High Court Rules Against Insurer in Fleeing Truck Case

April 20, 2009

  • April 21, 2009 at 12:56 pm
    Dazed and confused says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Now that a few have had time to comment, I will respond to Dave, I believe that anyone that suffers a loss at the stupid act of another should get adequite compensation for their loss. By the stupid person,not from the insurance companies. As mentioned by others this case is more about presidence and definitions than settlements. Where is it going to stop. When are the citizens going to say enough. If anyone commits an intentional act. DWI, excessive speeding 100 MPH while being chased by the policy. or armed robery. An insurance policy should not cover any damage caused while anyone is commiting an intentinal act. With regards to DWI claims. If the insurance companies were released from any liability caused by a DWI driver then the state might put more teeth into enforcing the laws. What ever happened to being responsable for your actions and paying the price for your actions. Insurance by it’s nature is to protect against the accidental loss of property not to protect the ignorance of an individual that ignores the rules.
    I’m Done. I hope everyone has a great day.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*