The said that INTENT was there, but NO CONFESSION. How did the Police obtain her confession? Then what becomes of CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE? I’ve read that people have received the Death Penalty based on Circumstantial Evidence. One wonders what can become of Embezzlement Cases where everything is there (all the evidence tied-in-a-bundle) except for the actual filming of the thief or the confession witness by 40 Bishops?
All it takes is a conversation with an attorney to inform you of your right to rip off an insurance company to get away with arson.
You have to have a priest, a rabbi and a preacher see them set a fire. If they disagree over the color of the person’s shirt, then it could be a case of mistaken identity and you still get off.
Too bad you can’t beat a speeding ticket this easy.
We have updated our privacy policy to be more clear and meet the new requirements of the GDPR. By continuing to use our site, you accept our revised Privacy Policy.
The said that INTENT was there, but NO CONFESSION. How did the Police obtain her confession? Then what becomes of CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE? I’ve read that people have received the Death Penalty based on Circumstantial Evidence. One wonders what can become of Embezzlement Cases where everything is there (all the evidence tied-in-a-bundle) except for the actual filming of the thief or the confession witness by 40 Bishops?
I guess your eyebrows have to be smoking to be found guilty.
All it takes is a conversation with an attorney to inform you of your right to rip off an insurance company to get away with arson.
You have to have a priest, a rabbi and a preacher see them set a fire. If they disagree over the color of the person’s shirt, then it could be a case of mistaken identity and you still get off.
Too bad you can’t beat a speeding ticket this easy.