To Call or to E-Mail? That Is the Question

November 8, 2010

  • November 8, 2010 at 4:01 am
    Me-O-My-O says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I couldn’t disagree more. Phone calls are big time-wasters compared with e-mail, and the only time one should make a phone call is when one needs to actually discuss an issue in real-time. Otherwise, e-mail is far more efficient.

  • November 8, 2010 at 5:36 am
    Claim Gal says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I have to also say that I don’t agree. I receive much better and timely results when I e-mail rather than call. In addition, sometimes when you call it ends up taking much longer (due to the chit-chatting) than if you would have e-mailed.

  • November 9, 2010 at 9:30 am
    Darnovak says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    People will tell you anything over the telephone and if you don’t have the capability to record the call – you are s.o.l.
    I want it in writing – especially if the transaction is subject to E&O.

  • November 9, 2010 at 4:53 am
    Guy Hoffman says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I agree with all of the comments and not the writer. E-mail can be a critical component of a fully documented claims file. It’s always better to have an audit trail in claims.

  • November 15, 2010 at 11:23 am
    Liz says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Phone calls can always be recorded… and recordings can always be lost. However, emails are almost always retrievable if lost. Emails provide valuable proof of what’s said, should it ever be needed. I could not disagree more with some of the things written in this article. While phone calls are always an option, and sometimes, a call works better, emails are trackable. They’re written proof of what has taken place. You can attach an email to a claim file a lot better than you can a phone call.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*