You’re a typical lib. You’ve no creativity or cleverness, let alone, enough intellect to respond to anything with a substantive, informative comment. So, you ignore the substance of a post and go right to childness name calling in the form of a bad joke/ ostensible insult.
And what weak name calling. Is that all you can come up with? What’s your second best comeback? Is it, ‘Your mother wears combat boot?’
Sheesh, you’re the epitome of the ill informed, humorless, lib true believer. You, my DemonRatic friend, have earned today’s Dummy of the IJ Blog designation.
You’re a freakshow escapee.
Now get back to the kitchen and finishing filling those McMac meal orders.
What do you know. I predicted that this might happen.
Now just wait and see if they investigate all of the big hitters who went short on sub-prime mortgage derivitives. Some of the others might well have been seling the derivitives while they were personally maintaining a personal short position. I imagine that the government will have to back off this for fear of bringing the economy down again. The very scent of this pushed the stock market down over 100 points.
This is what happens when gov’t gets involved in commerce. Basel II set a standard of risk-based capitalization for banks of 10% for cooperate bonds and 2% for CDOs.
This was done is cahoots between fascist, lib, big gov’t types and crony capitalists, such as GS.
Keep drinking that kool aid you phony lib freaks; soon you’ll only make enough money to see a movie and buy downloads of music.
Gee, do you ever wonder why so many entertainers are phony libs?
I suppose my second best comeback would have been to point out all of the grammatical and spelling mistakes in your response, but that would have been childish, or is it childness?
Maybe your third best comeback would be to actually address his comment. You know, the part about not being able to sell your home until you’ve sunk hundreds of not thousands of dollars into new appliances, or insulation, or whatever Dear Leader decides his subjects should do before he allows them to engage in private enterprise.
And please note: it’s poor manners to be critical of spelling and grammar on a blog. It’s also evidence that you have nothing else to say.
Isn’t it interesting that the GS charges coincide with a new monster bill regulating Wall Street? And how come Fanniemae and Freddiemac are immune? Their execs took multimillion dollar bonuses and then went to work for the Obama gang.
Until governmental and quasi governmental entities have to follow the same rules as private industry no progress will be made. Crucifying GS and other similar companies is a deliberate distraction to hide the flaky practices of the feds.
I would respond to the argument if it was balanced made sense, but you guys insist on making it political. The Democratic party does not have a monopoly on donations from large business interests. Goldman Sachs gave over $20M to the Democrats but they also gave the Republican party over $11m. Citigroup, who I believe were also “Too big to fail” gave more than $14M to BOTH parties.
But that’s O.K., keep making it a political argument by blaming the administration in power. Companies like Goldman Sachs and Citigroup will continue on as before because they have BOTH sides of the house in their pocket.
Please forgive my poor manners for insulting your grammar and spelling. I must have been bahaving stupid….or according to you, was I behaving “MORE STUPIDER?” LOL. Don’t worry, when you leave Kindergarten I’m sure your spelling will have improved.
There’s a difference between an obvious typo and spelling/grammatical errors. I point out the latter, but not the former. So, now name one spelling or grammar error.
But, first, finishing packaging those McMac meals.
And, then try addressing the substance of my comments, you silly little boy.
We have updated our privacy policy to be more clear and meet the new requirements of the GDPR. By continuing to use our site, you accept our revised Privacy Policy.
The blogs were interesting until Al and Joe, friend of DemonRats decided to join in. Were their comments posted during snack-time in Kindergarten?
So Decman, tell us how come we kindergarteners knew that you can’t sell a house w/o Algore’s approval if cap and trade passes, and you didn’t know it?
I mean, if we’re stupid, you’re more stupider.
You’re a typical lib. You’ve no creativity or cleverness, let alone, enough intellect to respond to anything with a substantive, informative comment. So, you ignore the substance of a post and go right to childness name calling in the form of a bad joke/ ostensible insult.
And what weak name calling. Is that all you can come up with? What’s your second best comeback? Is it, ‘Your mother wears combat boot?’
Sheesh, you’re the epitome of the ill informed, humorless, lib true believer. You, my DemonRatic friend, have earned today’s Dummy of the IJ Blog designation.
You’re a freakshow escapee.
Now get back to the kitchen and finishing filling those McMac meal orders.
What do you know. I predicted that this might happen.
Now just wait and see if they investigate all of the big hitters who went short on sub-prime mortgage derivitives. Some of the others might well have been seling the derivitives while they were personally maintaining a personal short position. I imagine that the government will have to back off this for fear of bringing the economy down again. The very scent of this pushed the stock market down over 100 points.
This is what happens when gov’t gets involved in commerce. Basel II set a standard of risk-based capitalization for banks of 10% for cooperate bonds and 2% for CDOs.
This was done is cahoots between fascist, lib, big gov’t types and crony capitalists, such as GS.
Keep drinking that kool aid you phony lib freaks; soon you’ll only make enough money to see a movie and buy downloads of music.
Gee, do you ever wonder why so many entertainers are phony libs?
I suppose my second best comeback would have been to point out all of the grammatical and spelling mistakes in your response, but that would have been childish, or is it childness?
Maybe your third best comeback would be to actually address his comment. You know, the part about not being able to sell your home until you’ve sunk hundreds of not thousands of dollars into new appliances, or insulation, or whatever Dear Leader decides his subjects should do before he allows them to engage in private enterprise.
And please note: it’s poor manners to be critical of spelling and grammar on a blog. It’s also evidence that you have nothing else to say.
Isn’t it interesting that the GS charges coincide with a new monster bill regulating Wall Street? And how come Fanniemae and Freddiemac are immune? Their execs took multimillion dollar bonuses and then went to work for the Obama gang.
Until governmental and quasi governmental entities have to follow the same rules as private industry no progress will be made. Crucifying GS and other similar companies is a deliberate distraction to hide the flaky practices of the feds.
I would respond to the argument if it was balanced made sense, but you guys insist on making it political. The Democratic party does not have a monopoly on donations from large business interests. Goldman Sachs gave over $20M to the Democrats but they also gave the Republican party over $11m. Citigroup, who I believe were also “Too big to fail” gave more than $14M to BOTH parties.
But that’s O.K., keep making it a political argument by blaming the administration in power. Companies like Goldman Sachs and Citigroup will continue on as before because they have BOTH sides of the house in their pocket.
Please forgive my poor manners for insulting your grammar and spelling. I must have been bahaving stupid….or according to you, was I behaving “MORE STUPIDER?” LOL. Don’t worry, when you leave Kindergarten I’m sure your spelling will have improved.
There’s a difference between an obvious typo and spelling/grammatical errors. I point out the latter, but not the former. So, now name one spelling or grammar error.
But, first, finishing packaging those McMac meals.
And, then try addressing the substance of my comments, you silly little boy.