Wal-Mart to Pay $11.7 Million to Settle U.S. Gender Bias Lawsuit

March 3, 2010

  • March 3, 2010 at 2:32 am
    Franklin says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    That was hilarious! Given the anonymity of the internet, I can agree with you 100%!!!

  • March 3, 2010 at 2:32 am
    LEM says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    So it’s payback time, huh? All you white men who have had it so good for all these years (who also by the way have nothing to do with the past treatment of anyone) are going to suffer. So if a company receives 100 applications from white men for a job but only 10 from women or some minority, who has the better odds of getting hired? Not the white guys. Diversity is only a euphemism for “less white men.” I am the mother of two future white men and I worry for them since their “ethnic group” is so often portrayed as the villains of society.

  • March 3, 2010 at 2:40 am
    pianoman88 says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    “if you were my husband it would be the dog house.” If you were my wife, GLADLY…

  • March 3, 2010 at 2:49 am
    SFOInsurance Lady says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    How many people here would feel the same if the shoe were on the other foot…the majority of the posts here are setting us back over 200 years. Pity….

  • March 3, 2010 at 2:51 am
    esquire says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    good point…Rosie has to go!

  • March 3, 2010 at 2:57 am
    Nugget says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    amen to that-

    Go check out what scholarships are available at colleges…oops- you’re a white male, nothing for you.

    Start a business… oops- you’re a white male, no special status like “woman-owned” or “minority-owned” for you.

    Actually do well at something, congratulations… oops- we all know that since you’re a white male, you harassed some women and discriminated against minorities along the way.

    Disagree with someone who isn’t a white male- oops, there’s your white male neanderthal bigotry showing.

    The Who said it best- “Nobody knows what it’s like to be the bad man, to be the sad man, behind blue eyes…”

  • March 3, 2010 at 3:07 am
    Rosie says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Let me guess…you work at WalMart, right? Are you a greeter, or is “hello” too difficult for you to pronounce?

  • March 3, 2010 at 3:10 am
    Rosie says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Yes…now you have an idea of what is was like for women and people of color/diverse ethnic background for the 200 years before affirmative action, and programs that corrected centuries of discrimination.

  • March 3, 2010 at 3:18 am
    cry me a river says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I’m so sick of everything having to be FAIR. Life isn’t fair. Accept it and move on. Let businesses hire who they want. If they think hiring old gay mormon black women is best for the company, that’s cool. It’s their decision. If a company’s hiring practices upset people, they’ll show their displeasure with their wallets and the company will be forced to re-think things. Until then, leave companies alone. Consumers and the free market will handle things much better than a poorly run government agency.

  • March 3, 2010 at 3:24 am
    An Agent from Arizona says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Getting back to the article. Unfortunately Walmart is not an isolated case. The law that was applied to Walmart was Title VII of the Civil Rights Act that is applied on a federal level to companies with 15 or more employees.Some individual statews may have stricter laws than the Federal Law, buat all states as a minimum are subject to Title VII. This law does not allow discrimination of employees based on their race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The Equal Pay Act of 1964 may have also been applied. The only exception of discrimination in the workplace would be if there was a Bona Fide Occupational Qualification (BFOQ). Race is never a BFOQ. An example of a BFOQ is an advertiser could advertise for only teenage girls if the ad dealt with teen swim wear. Obviously the warehouse would not qualify as women are just as qualified as men as long as they can meet the reasonable qualifications of the job. Before this ever reached the lawsuit stage Walmart had an opportunity to settle this situation with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). Walmart chose not to settle until after a lawsuit was filed. It looks like Walmart was caught and hopefully they will do a better job in the future to prevent discrimination. Several other companies have settled similar lawsuits, and without a doubt there will be more settlements in the future.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*