I wish they would spend their time and money on predicting PowerBall winning numbers…..I think I have it figured out. The number 9 came up twice in the last seven drawing!! Hurricane predicting…what a joke. Get it right once, even using your 3 mid-season “adjustments” then maybe your opinion will count.
Why is money being spent on these annual mental masturbation exercises? We’ll get however many freakin’ hurricanes mother nature decides to give birth to. It’s not like anybody can prepare for 20 instead of 10. What are people supposed to do with their forecast? (which is usually flawed anyway)
We have updated our privacy policy to be more clear and meet the new requirements of the GDPR. By continuing to use our site, you accept our revised Privacy Policy.
I wish they would spend their time and money on predicting PowerBall winning numbers…..I think I have it figured out. The number 9 came up twice in the last seven drawing!! Hurricane predicting…what a joke. Get it right once, even using your 3 mid-season “adjustments” then maybe your opinion will count.
Must be the same actuaries that were featured in yesterday’s article! I am impressed!
Gobble-gook
Why is money being spent on these annual mental masturbation exercises? We’ll get however many freakin’ hurricanes mother nature decides to give birth to. It’s not like anybody can prepare for 20 instead of 10. What are people supposed to do with their forecast? (which is usually flawed anyway)
Law of Large Numbers Comfirmed. Thanks Aon!
If you happen to be a catastrophe reinsurer, like AON is, you care a great deal about predicting the frequency of hurricanes.
And as for why its being done in the public sector, the federal government, through the NFIP, is also a catastrophe reinsurer.
…Cubs lose for the 100th straight year!!!