A fee of $15 is required for each entry submitted. There will be no refunds of entry fees
JunkScience.com, in its sole discretion, will determine the winner, if any, from UGWC entries. All determinations made by JunkScience.com are final.
The winner, if any, will receive $125,000 in a single, lump sum payment. JunkScience.com does not promise or guarantee that the UGWC will have any winner.
They gotta have rules, and these are oretty standard. Who should determine who the winner is? It’s the9ir money,after all, they should be able to judge their own contest.
Of course, you ahve submitted your entry, right? Right?
Reaper, you are right on the money, this is all about a political agenda, not reality. Is anyone feeling warm this year from the weather? Hell no! That is why they changed it to climate change because they realized the weather is making a u-turn (yes it was warming for a while as a very slight pace, but change trends have been going on forever). The played this game when they created the ice age panic! They did it again with the Ozone hole! There were a few other silly theories they came up with. What we are really getting is an IJ editor who spouse is a environwaco and lives in San Francisco! The IJ has been a great publication over the years, but has ceded itself to the San Francisco and Berkeley crowd, what real winners!
Another governmental ruse. Now AlGore is in the insurance business (wow first the internet, then the enviroment, now insurance). The climate change is a cycle change, but now put a “Global Warming” label on it and we must panic. Coastal regions beware, southern regions beware, polar bears beware. How about just Consumers beware, government will now pass another useless reactionary costly policy!
We have updated our privacy policy to be more clear and meet the new requirements of the GDPR. By continuing to use our site, you accept our revised Privacy Policy.
A fee of $15 is required for each entry submitted. There will be no refunds of entry fees
JunkScience.com, in its sole discretion, will determine the winner, if any, from UGWC entries. All determinations made by JunkScience.com are final.
The winner, if any, will receive $125,000 in a single, lump sum payment. JunkScience.com does not promise or guarantee that the UGWC will have any winner.
They gotta have rules, and these are oretty standard. Who should determine who the winner is? It’s the9ir money,after all, they should be able to judge their own contest.
Of course, you ahve submitted your entry, right? Right?
Reaper, you are right on the money, this is all about a political agenda, not reality. Is anyone feeling warm this year from the weather? Hell no! That is why they changed it to climate change because they realized the weather is making a u-turn (yes it was warming for a while as a very slight pace, but change trends have been going on forever). The played this game when they created the ice age panic! They did it again with the Ozone hole! There were a few other silly theories they came up with. What we are really getting is an IJ editor who spouse is a environwaco and lives in San Francisco! The IJ has been a great publication over the years, but has ceded itself to the San Francisco and Berkeley crowd, what real winners!
Another governmental ruse. Now AlGore is in the insurance business (wow first the internet, then the enviroment, now insurance). The climate change is a cycle change, but now put a “Global Warming” label on it and we must panic. Coastal regions beware, southern regions beware, polar bears beware. How about just Consumers beware, government will now pass another useless reactionary costly policy!