“This means that homos are many times more likely than heteros are to molest children.”
NO! To molest BOYS, not children, BOYS. They are just as likely to molest children, but much more likely to molest boys.
That should be obvious since if a man is molesting a boy, he is a pediphilic homosexual.
My point is that the whole study is a “Duh.”
We know men are more likely to molest children then women, so logically a homosexual man is more likely to molest a boy then a heterosexual man. Finally, a homosexual man is the perp 1/3 or the time boys are molested and hetro are the perps 2/3 or the time boys are molested.
If you ask me it should be 100% of the time because it is male to male contact. All this study proves is that of men who are sexually attracted to boys only 1/3 consider themselves homosexual. The other 2/3 consider themselves heterosexual.
That is what the numbers say.
In conclusion, I would like to quote the great writer and philosopher Mark Twain (Samuel Clemmons) who said: “There are three types of lies; Lies, damned lies, and Statistics.
I don’t think I have ever heard of this evil and sick behaviour coming out of a Jewish, Moslem or Hindu or Bhuddist temples and congregation(s). There is a strong possibility of either the training of the so-called ‘leaders’ of the accused churches or maybe of the religion itself that entices these perverted individuals to join. I suggest ALL male Christian leaders to resign and to be replaced with female ones. Just a thought…
Congratulations, your presence has now convinced me that not only has the intelligence of this country dropped like a rock, but so has their interest and understanding of current news stories.
Rabbis are known to molest their young parishioners as much as any other person with their traits (Middle aged white male.) Also, are convicted of attempting to hire “hit men” at an astounding rate (or maybe that’s just how the media plays it.)
As far as Hindu and Muslim leaders, I am sure that they match up statistically with their ilk (Age Gender Race ect.) You also have to look at their specific customs and social mores. If a society believes that intercourse with a 7 year old is “Ok” chances are it isn’t going to be reported as a crime to the authorities (especially when you are told God and his servants are the only authorities.)
In conclusion… are you really that dumb, or are you just that stupid?
“Jewish…”
The Talmud says that sex with a child before eight years-old “is nothing.”
“Moslem…”
Muhammed married a six year-old, a marriage that he consumated when she was nine. Ayatollah Khomeini married a ten year-old when he was twenty-nine. Also, polygamy is sanctioned by the Koran, as is wife beating.
“Hindu or Bhuddist…”
What we would consider child marriage is frequent, and marriages are usually arranged.
Actually, most sex perverts in America are not religious.
First, almost all perpetrators of child sexual abuse are males.
Second, about one-third (on average, some studies have more, some less) of the
victims of CSA are boys.
Therefore, about one-third of all CSA are men perpetrating sexual abuse upon
boys. Whether they consider themselves to be “homosexual” or “heterosexuals who
engage in same-sex behavior” is irrelevant. The fact is that homosexual
behavior is responsible for about 1/3 of all CSA.
Given the fact that, according to the best studies, only about 2-3 % of men have
persistent same-sex attractions, this means that individuals from 2-3% of the
population are responsible for up to 1/3 of all CSA.
The only way you can avoid this conclusion is to insist, rather irrationally, that men who are TOTALLY heterosexual “just happen”
to be sexually attracted to underage boys. This logic, which gay activists and
their supporters seem to accept, ignores the established fact that many
homosexuals and also child molesters are married or in heterosexual
relationships IN ADDITION to their pedophile activities.
The following statement is incorrect:
“Homosexuals are responsible for 33% of BOY molestation. BOY molestation
is 25% of the total molestation (the other 75% being girls.) It follows
therefore that, Homosexuals are(according to that study) responsible for 33% of
25% of all child molestations.”
The paper does NOT say that “homosexuals are responsible for 33% of BOY
molestations.” The paper says first of all that men are responsible for almost
ALL molestations, and that, furthermore, men who are sexually-attracted to those
of the same sex (albeit boys) are responsible for about 1/3 of all molestations,
which is vastly disproportional to their representation in the general population.
We have updated our privacy policy to be more clear and meet the new requirements of the GDPR. By continuing to use our site, you accept our revised Privacy Policy.
“This means that homos are many times more likely than heteros are to molest children.”
NO! To molest BOYS, not children, BOYS. They are just as likely to molest children, but much more likely to molest boys.
That should be obvious since if a man is molesting a boy, he is a pediphilic homosexual.
My point is that the whole study is a “Duh.”
We know men are more likely to molest children then women, so logically a homosexual man is more likely to molest a boy then a heterosexual man. Finally, a homosexual man is the perp 1/3 or the time boys are molested and hetro are the perps 2/3 or the time boys are molested.
If you ask me it should be 100% of the time because it is male to male contact. All this study proves is that of men who are sexually attracted to boys only 1/3 consider themselves homosexual. The other 2/3 consider themselves heterosexual.
That is what the numbers say.
In conclusion, I would like to quote the great writer and philosopher Mark Twain (Samuel Clemmons) who said: “There are three types of lies; Lies, damned lies, and Statistics.
Thank you and go on with life.
I don’t think I have ever heard of this evil and sick behaviour coming out of a Jewish, Moslem or Hindu or Bhuddist temples and congregation(s). There is a strong possibility of either the training of the so-called ‘leaders’ of the accused churches or maybe of the religion itself that entices these perverted individuals to join. I suggest ALL male Christian leaders to resign and to be replaced with female ones. Just a thought…
Wow, you are the biggest idiot yet.
Congratulations, your presence has now convinced me that not only has the intelligence of this country dropped like a rock, but so has their interest and understanding of current news stories.
Rabbis are known to molest their young parishioners as much as any other person with their traits (Middle aged white male.) Also, are convicted of attempting to hire “hit men” at an astounding rate (or maybe that’s just how the media plays it.)
As far as Hindu and Muslim leaders, I am sure that they match up statistically with their ilk (Age Gender Race ect.) You also have to look at their specific customs and social mores. If a society believes that intercourse with a 7 year old is “Ok” chances are it isn’t going to be reported as a crime to the authorities (especially when you are told God and his servants are the only authorities.)
In conclusion… are you really that dumb, or are you just that stupid?
“Jewish…”
The Talmud says that sex with a child before eight years-old “is nothing.”
“Moslem…”
Muhammed married a six year-old, a marriage that he consumated when she was nine. Ayatollah Khomeini married a ten year-old when he was twenty-nine. Also, polygamy is sanctioned by the Koran, as is wife beating.
“Hindu or Bhuddist…”
What we would consider child marriage is frequent, and marriages are usually arranged.
Actually, most sex perverts in America are not religious.
Wow, me and Willy are in agreement…
JUST BECAUSE YOU DON’T SEE IT ON THE FOX NEWS CHANNEL DOESN’T MEAN IT ISN’T HAPPENING!!!!!!!!
(That goes for you “Oh gosh, how I miss that fair and balanced Dan Rather guy” people too.)
Will wonders never cease?
By the way, I wrote to the author of the article that I quoted stats from, and got no response. So you win on that front (for now).
From the author of the piece I quoted:
First, almost all perpetrators of child sexual abuse are males.
Second, about one-third (on average, some studies have more, some less) of the
victims of CSA are boys.
Therefore, about one-third of all CSA are men perpetrating sexual abuse upon
boys. Whether they consider themselves to be “homosexual” or “heterosexuals who
engage in same-sex behavior” is irrelevant. The fact is that homosexual
behavior is responsible for about 1/3 of all CSA.
Given the fact that, according to the best studies, only about 2-3 % of men have
persistent same-sex attractions, this means that individuals from 2-3% of the
population are responsible for up to 1/3 of all CSA.
The only way you can avoid this conclusion is to insist, rather irrationally, that men who are TOTALLY heterosexual “just happen”
to be sexually attracted to underage boys. This logic, which gay activists and
their supporters seem to accept, ignores the established fact that many
homosexuals and also child molesters are married or in heterosexual
relationships IN ADDITION to their pedophile activities.
The following statement is incorrect:
“Homosexuals are responsible for 33% of BOY molestation. BOY molestation
is 25% of the total molestation (the other 75% being girls.) It follows
therefore that, Homosexuals are(according to that study) responsible for 33% of
25% of all child molestations.”
The paper does NOT say that “homosexuals are responsible for 33% of BOY
molestations.” The paper says first of all that men are responsible for almost
ALL molestations, and that, furthermore, men who are sexually-attracted to those
of the same sex (albeit boys) are responsible for about 1/3 of all molestations,
which is vastly disproportional to their representation in the general population.