Judge Denies State Farm Motion to Dismiss Miss. Lawsuit

May 9, 2007

  • May 11, 2007 at 6:49 am
    Melanie says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Intelligent people have called Mr Rust of State Farm for help this is just one of 1000000. In English. United States Court Southern District of Mississippi Clvil , Action – Ed Rust to Clarify his act as CEO. I will read if you do the same. Ladys.

  • May 11, 2007 at 6:56 am
    Linaggggggggg says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    March 7, 2007, 3:30 pm CST
    Posted By: Linda
    Comment:
    I am sure State Farm paid all the flood/water claims to AUTOS with comprehensive coverage.
    Do you really Linda??

  • May 12, 2007 at 7:56 am
    LL says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Melanie, it appears that your claim with State Farm was not settled to your satisfaction. Did you have flooding but not a flood policy in place? Whatever the reason, it makes your observation of that company not an objective one. Every company has a small number of disgruntled customers.

  • May 12, 2007 at 7:57 am
    Mary says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    May 2, 2007, 2:44 pm CDT
    Posted By: Mary B.
    Comment:
    You lost your home and went into BK because you are irresponsible and a total moron. Place the responsibility for your own inactions at your feet and quit blaming others. Your \”victimhood\” makes me vomit in my mouth.

  • May 12, 2007 at 8:22 am
    Melanie says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Call Anita Lee McClatch Newspapers. Ask Her About State Farm. Get all the News

  • May 13, 2007 at 11:45 am
    Investigate says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    It is the position of State Farm that the hurricane actually improved this kitchen. We should be charging the homeowner for improvements, not paying him for damages.

    *******

    This house died of old age. Not covered.

    *******

    I doubt there was even a house here to begin with. Investigate \”homeowner\” for insurance fraud.

    *******

    It appears that some rogue appliances pushed a car into this house. I\’m absolutely sure that the policy doesn\’t cover damage from cars being pushed by rogue appliances.

    *******

    OK, if the car ran into the house, then it\’s covered. But it looks to me like this happened the other way around.

    *******

    If you look closely, you\’ll see that it\’s the porch that\’s damaged, not the house itself. We sell homeowner\’s insurance, not porchowner\’s insurance.

    *******

    This house just quit. It doesn\’t look like it made even the slightest effort to weather the storm. We don\’t cover quitters.
    Subject Posted By Posted On
    RE: RE: State Farm is ROTTEN TO THE CORE

  • May 14, 2007 at 1:04 am
    the Voice says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    We did. The new contractor is well-known in our town, and came highly recommended, having a reputation for both fine work and honesty. The repairs cost $15,000 more than State Farm had given us. We carefully and honestly documented every penny of cost. State Farm refused to pay. We had to borrow the $15,000 on credit cards to pay our contractor. We hired an attorney who cost us another $15,000, which we had to borrow on credit cards.

    In July of this year, 2005, our case went to non-binding arbitration–a procedure the courts impose on hapless victims which accomplishes nothing more than wasting the unfortunate consumer\’s money and fattening all the attorneys involved. The arbiter, an attorney of more than 30 years experience in real estate law, ruled in our favor and awarded us 100% of everything that we asked for–100% of the repairs, 100% of our costs, and 100% of our attorney fees. But because it was a \”non-binding\” arbitration, State Farm thumbed its nose at us and simply refused to pay, and commenced to bargain with us.

    The arbiter told State Farm, at the arbitration, right in front of us, that if they pushed this to a jury trial, they would probably lose even more. I suspect that\’s the only reason we got as much as we did. Rather than have to borrow another $20 or $30 thousand and wait another couple of years, we caved in and accepted $29,100, allowing them to steal $3500 from us.

    Now think a moment, if you will: How many ordinary little homeowners can afford to come up with $17,000 in attorney\’s fees and costs to go after an insurance company? How many even have that kind of borrowing power? Not many, you say? Well then, those are the majority of State Farm\’s victims–the people without a voice, without the money to buy justice, the people who have no choice but to give up and go away. Which is, of course, exactly what State Farm expects, and why it is so profitable for them to automatically attempt to cheat every claimant at least a little bit, and some a lot.

  • May 14, 2007 at 11:59 am
    LL says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Crist was a mistake for insurance companies. But the other guy was even worse. When you only have 2 devil to choose from….

  • May 14, 2007 at 12:40 pm
    GA says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Adonis of Stone Mountain GA (05/06/05)
    My home was completely burglarized with all my contents and belongings stolen on or about weekend of March 1, 2005. I have provided State Farm with all documentation within my capacity including receipts for major purchases. It is now May 5, 2005 with no resolution in sight. My family is not able to go back home due to the fact we have nothing. I have been exercising a great deal of patience with the situation because i have been out of state to my grandmother being in her last stage with cancer. Now i am making preparations to return and i have nothing.

    State Farm has requested me to do a statement under oath with their attorney. i have complied with all they have asked. I think its completely absurd that even on this date with all my belongings and furniture stolen they are not providing me with any level of satisfaction nor statute of time in which this claim will be handled. I know based on conversation and dialogue with State Farms Attorney that i am being depicted as the bad guy as opposed to the victim i have become in this lost. I have paid my homeowners insurance premium for 5 years with no problems and never has a claim been filed. Now i have been victimized in a burglary and i the insured cant get any satisfaction from State Farm.

    The comments and statements from the State Farms\’ parties involved is such of a racially or demographically based insinuation. As if i am committing some type of fraud. I would like to have this issue addressed and researched to ensure that as an insured consumer i have been treated fairly and rationally without a biased or personal interest by representatives of State Farm Insurance Company.

  • May 14, 2007 at 2:18 am
    Mary B. says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    History, LL and Mary – you make no sense and you are sad.

    Melanie – hire Agent Mulder from the X-files and maybe you can find the Truth out there….

    GA – play the race card a little \”louder\” and you will get the help you \”deserve\”.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*