Large Recoveries for Pet Owners Unlikely in Pet Food Suits

April 3, 2007

  • April 3, 2007 at 2:52 am
    Jewel says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Posted By: Big Insurance
    Comment:
    Let\’s be civil.
    hehehehehehe. (you know what I mean Big, don\’t you?)

    This thread really blew up while I was at lunch. I liked the posts once I took out all of the unnecessary insults.

  • April 3, 2007 at 2:53 am
    The donald says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    at least there you get paid for making no sense

  • April 3, 2007 at 2:53 am
    Compman says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    You are right Courtney. It still amazes me how many illiterate inbred morons populate these forums and think the all mighty Madame Bela-Pelosi and her ilk can save the day.

  • April 3, 2007 at 2:56 am
    Not Surprised says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I did \’t know that Rosie O\’Donnell read these articles.

    Rosie I think it\’s time to renew your Weight Watchers membership… or maybe that is just hot air build up.

  • April 3, 2007 at 2:58 am
    Cooper says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I find it funny anyone thinks they would get more from a class action lawsuit other than the attys! Surprise, the legal expert suggests this route.

  • April 3, 2007 at 2:59 am
    Courtney says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    If they are illiterate, I doubt they would be posting, let alone reading the articles. (Just trying to help you out!)

  • April 3, 2007 at 3:02 am
    Lisa says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Neither option will adequately compensate people who lost a pet. They are classified as property. That means if you got your pet from the local shelter and paid $50, you\’ll get $50.

  • April 3, 2007 at 3:03 am
    Mark says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Lisa,

    Thanks for the article. It contained some good information.

    The ire in many of these comments does not come from a lack of perspective as to possible human food contamination, but from Rosie\’s contention that President Bush should roll up his sleaves and start giving CPR to our pets. He has people to do that for him, namely the FDA.

    The article you posted quoated an FDA official:
    \”To date, we have nothing that indicates it\’s gone into human food,\” said Dorothy Miller , director of the FDA\’s Office of Emergency Operations . \”We have a bit more investigation to do.\”

    Let\’s not go insane speculating how safe our food supply is, when all indications are that it is safe.

  • April 3, 2007 at 3:08 am
    Big Insurance says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I suppose to the rabid lefties, Bush is to blame. Alberto Gonzales fired a few attorneys, so he must be part of the conspiracy. It wasn\’t Islamist terrorists that took the British hostages either, but Iranian freedom fighters; and it wasn\’t because of the weakness shown by the Bush-haters that emboldened them either – right?

    It\’s \”Jimmy Carter\” time in the U.S. Congress, with the \”give peace a chance\” crowd who would rather remain ignorant of the risks, lose what we have, and blame Bush for losing it rather than here own selfish navel gazing pseudo-intellectual selves.

    And yes, I\’m a proud conservative from a blue state, never \”Neo\” always \”Con\”.

    Halliburton!

  • April 3, 2007 at 3:09 am
    Compman says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Your right Courtney, illiterate was the wrong choice of words. How about mis-informed and gullible



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*