You\’re yanking our collective chain right? C\’mon. You can admit it. There can\’t be anybody in America not wearing a white hood that could possibly believe the holocost (sic) didn\’t really murder approximately 6 million Jews.
No really, how come there is no memorial with the names? Just tell me that. Why cant we just come up with a list and put this thing to bed – If someone killed my reletives I think I would notice it and remember their names, wouldnt you?
My apologies. I thought you were kidding. It just never occurred to me you could be serious. I\’ll let someone else who has patience for ignorance respond.
Do us all a huge favor – promise you won\’t continue your gene line into the next generation!
I don\’t know which is more unbelievably stupid: your comments, or your willingness to make them in public and reveal the extent of your mind-numbing stupidity!
Is it really possible you\’ve never read a book…OK, seen a film…OK, watched a TV show that exposed the awful and hideous things done to Jews and others during the Nazi progroms? \”If someone in my family is murdered I\’d notice..\” – what about when EVERY member of the family is murdered? And EVERY member of EVERY family on the block, or in the neighborhood, or in the town is murdered with nobody left to \”notice\”? D\’ya think it might have been a little tough in the 1930\’s and 40\’s to keep track of 6 million people who were taken far from their homes and imprisoned, tortured and buried or burned into nothingness? Duh!!
You\’re a disgrace to the human race, Mell. And that\’s being about as diplomatic as I can be.
People, people…don\’t humor this person. Whatever he is calling himself today, his only point is to get you up in arms. He\’s not worth the effort in typing a response.
\”We are talking about a guy who made a movie ( Schindlers\’s List ) as though it were a true story . You will find the book in the FICTION section at your local library . Don\’t fret though , it will be in the history section soon enough .\”
Uhm, so your point is that this movie isn\’t based on a true story? Or that it is based on a true story? It seems as if you are pointing out that the book is in the wrong section of the library and therefore, you believe the events portrayed in the film actually took place.
Then you follow up that comment by saying: \”I brought up Schindlers List to point out an easily verifable example of Mr Speilbergs\’ dishonesty .\”
So, again it is like you are trying to say the movie has no basis in truth at all. Can you please clarify your point of view because with all of your contradictions, I can\’t figure it out.
Oh and to the \”person\” who thinks there should be a Holocaust wall with the names of all those killed in concentration camps:
Hmm, I know those Nazis kept detailed records but I\’m pretty sure this would be next to impossible. Sorry, but I don\’t need it to prove the Holocaust happened. Of course, I am sure someone will comment that I wasn\’t there. You\’re right. So, in that case, George Washington was NOT the first president and the whole moon landing was just a scam. Brilliant!
Let me get you straight: I asked why Speilberg should fire his staff and I asked what being jewish had to do with stolen art. This made me a racist? Someone else brought up the comment about Speilberg being jewish and I failed to see any connection. You say the FBI was monitoring him because he was jewish? The FBI must have a lot of resoureces to monitor people just because they are jewish…the FBI is the Gestapo?….and as for firing his staff…why would Speilberg even want to keep stolen art? Why should anyone keep silent about any stolen goods, whether it is art, whatever the religion of the owner, how does being jewish connect to stolen art? I am anything but racist; I wanted to know what how Speilberg\’s religion connected to this and I would REWARD my staff for pointing out that I possesed something stolen. I don\’t \”covet my neighbor\’s goods\”, nor do I care how or what or who they worship. racist??? I think not. And I do not suffer theives well either!
Within five minutes, any intelligent, open-minded person can be convinced that the Holocaust gassings of World War II are a profitable hoax.
Fred A. Leuchter is America\’s leading specialist on the design and fabrication of execution equipment, including homicidal gas chambers. In 1988, Leuchter scraped samples from the alleged gas chamber walls in Auschwitz, Birkenau and Lublin. Cyanide residue would be clearly evident on all these walls if gassings did occur. To his astonishment, Leuchter found no significant cyanide traces in any one of these rooms.
In 1991, the Polish government repeated these tests to disprove Leuchter\’s findings, but they as well found no evidence of any gassings ever occurring.
The structural integrity of these \”gas chambers\” is also extremely faulty. These rooms have ordinary doors and windows which are not hermetically sealed! There are large gaps between the floors and doors. If the Germans had attempted to gas anyone in these rooms, they would have died themselves, as the gas would have leaked and contaminated the entire area. Also, no equipment exists to exhaust the air-gas mixture from these buildings. Nothing was made to introduce or distribute the gas throughout the chambers. There are no provisions to prevent condensation of gas on the walls, floors or ceilings. No exhaust stacks have ever existed.
Though six million Jews supposedly died in the gas chambers, not one body has ever been autopsied and found to have died of gas poisoning. We have been shown piles of bodies from World War II, but most of these persons died of typhus or starvation or Allied bombings and a great many of those were murdered Germans, not Jews. Roughly the equivalent of ten football fields should be packed full of gassed bodies to present as evidence, yet not one body has ever been discovered.
The Germans documented everything in meticulous detail from shrubbery to arbors, but no pre-war or wartime plans or documents exist that detail or even mention any gas chambers for reasons of genocide. All documents ever presented were drawn up AFTER the war.
Even if we threw away all the evidence and accounted for every so-called gas chamber, it would have taken 68 YEARS to accomplish gassing six million Jews!
You can\’t just report half a story and expect people to buy into it, Mell. Well, just the gullible ones, I guess. I found this information and it took me all of 10 seconds.
\”Leuchter does not address the discrepancy between the trace amounts of cyanide which he dismisses vs. the complete lack of any cyanide residue found in his sample 12, a sample taken from a gasket in an unrelated building intended for use as a negative control [1]; instead he only compares the low amounts in the alleged Krema to the higher readings in his positive control sample.
Lab manager James Roth swore under oath to the results at the trial. It was only after he got off the stand that Roth learned what the trial was about. In an interview for Morris\’s film, Roth states that cyanide would have formed an extremely fine layer on the walls, to the depth of one-tenth of a human hair. Leuchter had taken samples of indeterminate thickness (he is seen in Morris\’s film hammering at the bricks with a rock hammer). Not informed of this, Roth had pulverized the entire samples, thus severely diluting the cyanide-containing layer of each sample with an indeterminate amount of brick, varying for each sample. Roth offers the analogy that the tests were like looking at timbers when one needed to be looking at the paint.
Leuchter did not examine the walls of the gas chambers until fifty years after they had been used; his critics note that it would have been virtually impossible to discover any cyanide at all using his method. In fact, tests conducted on ventilation grates immediately after the end of the war showed substantial amounts of cyanide. The chambers were demolished by the Nazis when they abandoned Auschwitz, and the facilities Leuchter examined were, in fact, partially reconstructed. Leuchter was unaware that part of the camp and chambers were reconstructed, so he had no way of knowing if the bricks he was scraping were actually part of the original gas chamber.\”
The screenplay for the movie is based on a novel of the same name . A novel is fiction as opposed to an historical account which is generally considered non-fiction . Do you know the difference ?
Just because a story injects an element that may be accurate , such as the existence of a central character , it does not make the rest of the story true.
We have updated our privacy policy to be more clear and meet the new requirements of the GDPR. By continuing to use our site, you accept our revised Privacy Policy.
You\’re yanking our collective chain right? C\’mon. You can admit it. There can\’t be anybody in America not wearing a white hood that could possibly believe the holocost (sic) didn\’t really murder approximately 6 million Jews.
No really, how come there is no memorial with the names? Just tell me that. Why cant we just come up with a list and put this thing to bed – If someone killed my reletives I think I would notice it and remember their names, wouldnt you?
My apologies. I thought you were kidding. It just never occurred to me you could be serious. I\’ll let someone else who has patience for ignorance respond.
Mell,
Do us all a huge favor – promise you won\’t continue your gene line into the next generation!
I don\’t know which is more unbelievably stupid: your comments, or your willingness to make them in public and reveal the extent of your mind-numbing stupidity!
Is it really possible you\’ve never read a book…OK, seen a film…OK, watched a TV show that exposed the awful and hideous things done to Jews and others during the Nazi progroms? \”If someone in my family is murdered I\’d notice..\” – what about when EVERY member of the family is murdered? And EVERY member of EVERY family on the block, or in the neighborhood, or in the town is murdered with nobody left to \”notice\”? D\’ya think it might have been a little tough in the 1930\’s and 40\’s to keep track of 6 million people who were taken far from their homes and imprisoned, tortured and buried or burned into nothingness? Duh!!
You\’re a disgrace to the human race, Mell. And that\’s being about as diplomatic as I can be.
People, people…don\’t humor this person. Whatever he is calling himself today, his only point is to get you up in arms. He\’s not worth the effort in typing a response.
\”We are talking about a guy who made a movie ( Schindlers\’s List ) as though it were a true story . You will find the book in the FICTION section at your local library . Don\’t fret though , it will be in the history section soon enough .\”
Uhm, so your point is that this movie isn\’t based on a true story? Or that it is based on a true story? It seems as if you are pointing out that the book is in the wrong section of the library and therefore, you believe the events portrayed in the film actually took place.
Then you follow up that comment by saying: \”I brought up Schindlers List to point out an easily verifable example of Mr Speilbergs\’ dishonesty .\”
So, again it is like you are trying to say the movie has no basis in truth at all. Can you please clarify your point of view because with all of your contradictions, I can\’t figure it out.
Oh and to the \”person\” who thinks there should be a Holocaust wall with the names of all those killed in concentration camps:
Hmm, I know those Nazis kept detailed records but I\’m pretty sure this would be next to impossible. Sorry, but I don\’t need it to prove the Holocaust happened. Of course, I am sure someone will comment that I wasn\’t there. You\’re right. So, in that case, George Washington was NOT the first president and the whole moon landing was just a scam. Brilliant!
Let me get you straight: I asked why Speilberg should fire his staff and I asked what being jewish had to do with stolen art. This made me a racist? Someone else brought up the comment about Speilberg being jewish and I failed to see any connection. You say the FBI was monitoring him because he was jewish? The FBI must have a lot of resoureces to monitor people just because they are jewish…the FBI is the Gestapo?….and as for firing his staff…why would Speilberg even want to keep stolen art? Why should anyone keep silent about any stolen goods, whether it is art, whatever the religion of the owner, how does being jewish connect to stolen art? I am anything but racist; I wanted to know what how Speilberg\’s religion connected to this and I would REWARD my staff for pointing out that I possesed something stolen. I don\’t \”covet my neighbor\’s goods\”, nor do I care how or what or who they worship. racist??? I think not. And I do not suffer theives well either!
Within five minutes, any intelligent, open-minded person can be convinced that the Holocaust gassings of World War II are a profitable hoax.
Fred A. Leuchter is America\’s leading specialist on the design and fabrication of execution equipment, including homicidal gas chambers. In 1988, Leuchter scraped samples from the alleged gas chamber walls in Auschwitz, Birkenau and Lublin. Cyanide residue would be clearly evident on all these walls if gassings did occur. To his astonishment, Leuchter found no significant cyanide traces in any one of these rooms.
In 1991, the Polish government repeated these tests to disprove Leuchter\’s findings, but they as well found no evidence of any gassings ever occurring.
The structural integrity of these \”gas chambers\” is also extremely faulty. These rooms have ordinary doors and windows which are not hermetically sealed! There are large gaps between the floors and doors. If the Germans had attempted to gas anyone in these rooms, they would have died themselves, as the gas would have leaked and contaminated the entire area. Also, no equipment exists to exhaust the air-gas mixture from these buildings. Nothing was made to introduce or distribute the gas throughout the chambers. There are no provisions to prevent condensation of gas on the walls, floors or ceilings. No exhaust stacks have ever existed.
Though six million Jews supposedly died in the gas chambers, not one body has ever been autopsied and found to have died of gas poisoning. We have been shown piles of bodies from World War II, but most of these persons died of typhus or starvation or Allied bombings and a great many of those were murdered Germans, not Jews. Roughly the equivalent of ten football fields should be packed full of gassed bodies to present as evidence, yet not one body has ever been discovered.
The Germans documented everything in meticulous detail from shrubbery to arbors, but no pre-war or wartime plans or documents exist that detail or even mention any gas chambers for reasons of genocide. All documents ever presented were drawn up AFTER the war.
Even if we threw away all the evidence and accounted for every so-called gas chamber, it would have taken 68 YEARS to accomplish gassing six million Jews!
Seems as if Mell left out some information:
You can\’t just report half a story and expect people to buy into it, Mell. Well, just the gullible ones, I guess. I found this information and it took me all of 10 seconds.
\”Leuchter does not address the discrepancy between the trace amounts of cyanide which he dismisses vs. the complete lack of any cyanide residue found in his sample 12, a sample taken from a gasket in an unrelated building intended for use as a negative control [1]; instead he only compares the low amounts in the alleged Krema to the higher readings in his positive control sample.
Lab manager James Roth swore under oath to the results at the trial. It was only after he got off the stand that Roth learned what the trial was about. In an interview for Morris\’s film, Roth states that cyanide would have formed an extremely fine layer on the walls, to the depth of one-tenth of a human hair. Leuchter had taken samples of indeterminate thickness (he is seen in Morris\’s film hammering at the bricks with a rock hammer). Not informed of this, Roth had pulverized the entire samples, thus severely diluting the cyanide-containing layer of each sample with an indeterminate amount of brick, varying for each sample. Roth offers the analogy that the tests were like looking at timbers when one needed to be looking at the paint.
Leuchter did not examine the walls of the gas chambers until fifty years after they had been used; his critics note that it would have been virtually impossible to discover any cyanide at all using his method. In fact, tests conducted on ventilation grates immediately after the end of the war showed substantial amounts of cyanide. The chambers were demolished by the Nazis when they abandoned Auschwitz, and the facilities Leuchter examined were, in fact, partially reconstructed. Leuchter was unaware that part of the camp and chambers were reconstructed, so he had no way of knowing if the bricks he was scraping were actually part of the original gas chamber.\”
The screenplay for the movie is based on a novel of the same name . A novel is fiction as opposed to an historical account which is generally considered non-fiction . Do you know the difference ?
Just because a story injects an element that may be accurate , such as the existence of a central character , it does not make the rest of the story true.
Someone who sells fiction as fact is dishonest .