Allstate Says It Paid Katrina Claims of Type State Farm Denied

February 15, 2007

  • February 18, 2007 at 6:28 am
    shaun says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    so, for all of you who know all of this information or think you do! allstate told us we had a hurricane policy endorsment, allstate told us we were not in a flood zone and did not need flood insurance, us army corp said your not in a federal flood zone, wells fargo said, you do not need a flood policy.

    as mentioned the insurance co.\’s violated the law of ms.

    FRAUD was commited on the people of ms which is why SF has and will continue to settle IN FEAR THAT ALL OF YOU FAITHFULL CUSTOMERS might realize that at any time they could do this to you.

    it is not the insureds legal duty to prove exactly what happened. in fact if we had not evacuated part of our policy would have been void.

    can you imagine hurricane winds for hours not doing any damage? a perfect house waiting for storm surge. by the way my SBA DAMAGE ASSESMENT was 195,000 and it was insured for 177,000 I had walls and roof but everything els was ripped out, if you did not know it was not a huge wave the water rose slowly and left slowly compare the floods in other parts of the country not the same at all.

    by the way the policy excluded all sorts of water damage but no where in the policy was STORM SURGE mentioned. could this just be an error on the part of allstate or is it because the information provided to the state to obtain approval for rate increases included storm surge and wind damage estimates?

    why was my policy not called a hurricane WIND policy?

    not to be rude but if ya\’ll would read these policies, the laws of the state of MS and weather events that occured you might think differently.

    And guess what ya\’ll are paying for the damage anyway- FEMA, GRANTS and yes NATIONAL FLOOD who has paid, you all have while the insurance executives are getting tax breaks on their highest profits ever.

  • February 20, 2007 at 2:38 am
    Mark says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Shaun,

    Let me address this statement of yours…

    \”as mentioned the insurance co.\’s violated the law of ms.

    FRAUD was commited on the people of ms…\”

    If the law of MS does not allow for anti-concurrent causation clauses, then why did the Dept. of Ins. approve State Farm\’s policy language? Should the Dept. of Ins. not be held to some account for this FRAUD committed on the people of MS?

    By the way, I have read State Farm\’s policy cover to cover and understand how to interpret and apply said language. As far as MS law goes, I am at a loss, but can read and understand.

    P.S. Proper capitalization and punctuation would mke reading the rest of your post much easier, and then it might make more sense.

  • February 20, 2007 at 2:39 am
    Mark says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Improved typing skills and spelling would increase the readability of my posts…

  • March 19, 2007 at 8:29 am
    richard says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    allstate is slippery as an eel.i see no difference in the way they have treated us verses state farm. they sell a policy with hurricane coverage knowing full well that when the time comes they can revert to the smallest of print loop holes.paying 10,000 for a roof on a house that no longer exists and then telling you that is the total of your wind damage[hmmmm]just criminal

  • February 12, 2010 at 10:43 am
    Don says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I despise insurance companies because they love to collect premiums but hate to pay claims. They have the clout to force everyone to buy insurance (automobile) and then to deny claims whenever possible, as do the home insurers and the health insurers. They have a license to steal from the American people and the money to buy politicians to keep them in power.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*