This article was truly painful to read. It is grammatically abysmal and poorly organized. It is rife with spelling errors and nonsensical quotes. Both author and editor should find a new line of work.
This information was both timely and helpful to me. I’m sure there was vastly more information given at the symposium, but I appreciate the concise factual summary. Thanks for the good work.
We have updated our privacy policy to be more clear and meet the new requirements of the GDPR. By continuing to use our site, you accept our revised Privacy Policy.
This article was truly painful to read. It is grammatically abysmal and poorly organized. It is rife with spelling errors and nonsensical quotes. Both author and editor should find a new line of work.
This information was both timely and helpful to me. I’m sure there was vastly more information given at the symposium, but I appreciate the concise factual summary. Thanks for the good work.
This article was poorly organized. It skipped around and was not focused.