and you wonder why they had to fork the amount out?! this is why it does not make any sense. if your at-fault, you should be paying. in this case the state has to file w/the current company despite the fact they were not at-fault. the problem is that the insurance company can not increase it’s rates because it was a not-at fault for the state. recouping the cost is going to be wasted, because it is a no-fault state.
We have updated our privacy policy to be more clear and meet the new requirements of the GDPR. By continuing to use our site, you accept our revised Privacy Policy.
and you wonder why they had to fork the amount out?! this is why it does not make any sense. if your at-fault, you should be paying. in this case the state has to file w/the current company despite the fact they were not at-fault. the problem is that the insurance company can not increase it’s rates because it was a not-at fault for the state. recouping the cost is going to be wasted, because it is a no-fault state.