Ambitions for 2009 UN Climate Pact Fade in Poznan

December 9, 2008

  • December 9, 2008 at 3:15 am
    Cilly says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    A major new scientific study concludes the impact of carbon dioxide emissions on worldwide temperatures is largely irrelevant, prompting one veteran meteorologist to quip, “You can go outside and spit and have the same effect as doubling carbon dioxide.”

    http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=57253

    A change in climate history data at NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies recently occurred which dramatically alters the debate over global warming. Yet, this transpired with no official announcement from GISS head James Hansen, and went unreported until Steve McIntyre of Climate Audit discovered it Wednesday.
    http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2007/08/09/did-media-or-nasa-withhold-climate-history-data-changes-public

    Weather station data hidden from public; scientists allege government cover-up

    The theory of global warming began to explain one simple set of factsm– surface temperature monitoring stations have shown a roughly one degree rise over the past century. But just where does these temperature readings come from? Most are reported by volunteer stations, usually no more than a thermometer inside a small wooden hut or below a roof overhang. In the US, 1,221 such stations exist, all administered by the National Climatic Data Center, a branch of the NOAA.
    http://www.dailytech.com/New+Scandal+Erupts+over+NOAA+Climate+Data/article8347.htm



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*