$525 Million Partial Executive Life Settlement

February 16, 2005

  • November 16, 2007 at 8:28 am
    Don Owens says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Looking for information about the check I received.

  • November 22, 2007 at 12:18 pm
    SR says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Go here for more info.
    http://www.auroralife.com/
    Ph# 800-265-2652 Prompt 4

    AURORA AVI UPDATE 10/17/07
    In connection with the order issued by the California Conservation Court on June 29, 2007, the Conservation and Liquidation Office of the California Department of Insurance (CLO) engaged Aurora to distribute approximately $400 million to current and former Aurora policyholders whose Executive Life Insurance Company policies had been assumed by Aurora. The Court approved agreement specified how each policyholder’s share of such sum was to be calculated. After calculating each policyholder’s share of such amount pursuant to such agreement, on October 1, 2007, Aurora distributed such funds by mailing about 140,000 checks to its current annuitants and former policyholders who were entitled to a share. In force annual premium whole life contract holders have had their share of this distribution credited to their policy’s account value. Not every policyholder was eligible for a share of the distribution.

    Aurora is currently receiving a higher volume of telephone calls and written correspondence than usual as a result of the distribution. Should you have any questions, please forward all written inquires to:

    Aurora, PO Box 448, Hartford, CT 06141-0448.

  • January 12, 2008 at 1:54 am
    Anonymous says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    The entire state seizure of ELIC was a fraud! So many years ago, but nothing’s changed. This last payout is just the most recent of all of the Aurora/ELIC thefts. My guarantee is on paper only, I’ve never been assured of getting my money from month to month. And the addresses the payments get sent to? Both my ex-wife and friend are dead, one shot by the police. The similarity? Both addresses I used for ELIC/Aurora. My new home address? My checks get delivered to my neighbors. Go to court about it? The windows of my car and apartment get shot out. Write to John Garamendi? He’s not even supposed to be in office, he doesn’t want to hear about it.

    When ELIC issued garnishment refunds in 1996, I couldn’t even get mine until I changed banks. Apparently some banks won’t even accept ELIC/Aurora money. When I was banking with Security Pacific I actually saw one of my payments sitting before a bank teller. She hadn’t even deposited it, I guess she was just sitting there looking at it.

    I have altered court papers that prove some of the transactions that went with the ELIC deal are false. I’ve gone through a lot to get them, some aren’t even on file anymore.

    Here the whole thing has been one long case of false imprisonment. No idea how these people got away with it, but it’s just one big white-collar crime and I have court papers proving some of it.

    And that’s the way it is, no matter what side of the Atlantic the money went to.

  • February 7, 2008 at 4:55 am
    Anonymous says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Aurora is never going to treat its investors as it’s supposed to. “If Aurora decides you need any more money?”
    what’s that supposed to mean? It’s not Aurora’s money, it’s your money. Aurora shouldn’t be the one that decides if you “need” any more money, that’s your business. To a certain extent, anyway.

    But when questioned about the payout, Aurora directs the caller to the state Department of Insurance and Willard Roberts. Roberts directs you back to Aurora, who promptly redirects you to Roberts again. What does Roberts do? Sends you right back to Aurora. Neither one will tell you what criteria needs to be met to have a “participating” policy.

    And “participating” is a pivotal word. It was used in the ELIC opt-out packages that were sent out in 1994. You had to have a policy purchased before November, 1988, in order to be considered for any type of reimbursement should you have chosen the opt-out plan. This means that if you purchased your policy after November 1988 you weren’t guaranteed getting any money back at all. And, if previous to that cut off date, you might have only gotten one third of your money back. So, what was a “participating” contract? What did “participating” mean?

    And that ELIC Adams fellow; back in the old days of the stock market, persons like him would get into trouble. The stories of old women getting bilked out of their life savings were exactly what Adams could be accused of. Didn’t matter if ELIC was really bankrupt or not, Adams was morally corrupt and bankrupt himself. Maybe replacing him and taking all of his pencils and ink pens away would have been sufficient to keep ELIC alive, but we’ll never know now.

    And if you have money from investments in other companies, or other savings, you’ll find out that it’s not compatible with Aurora money. Who knows why, it’s all legal tender, but Aurora money just doesn’t work with other American coin. That’s wrong? Ethically, yes. In real life, that’s what’s happened. Split your family right up. Aurora money’s just Monopoly money now.

    Try to complain and see how long you stay out of jail. Think they won’t frame you to discredit your testimony? Think again.

    Chick and Snyder, two apt replacements for Adams. Resty Zampanta, another ELIC/Aurora employee who was memorable. Valencia Owens, all employees whose names should go down in history with the names of those Americans involved in the ’29 Stock Market Crash.

    Your name’s there now, too.

  • February 12, 2008 at 9:24 am
    dennis v brown says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    i have a policy its my retirment policy dose this efect it?

  • October 24, 2009 at 6:55 am
    PETER NORTH says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    LOOKS LIKE ANOTHER PHASE OF THIS CASE WILL BE BROUGHT ON IN 2010.

  • March 11, 2010 at 9:01 am
    JR says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Is there action going on with this case again recently? If so, who will get money this time. I could use a couple thousand dollars right about now.

  • March 11, 2010 at 10:06 am
    JR says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    The reason I asked the question is that I got a call yesterday asking questions about the original policy I had about 25 years ago. I remembered nothing but I did remind them not to forget me if they started giving out money.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*