Pennsylvania Woman Wins 2-Cent Lawsuit Against Wal-Mart

October 3, 2011

  • October 3, 2011 at 2:59 pm
    Jester says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 1
    Thumb down 6

    This woman needs to get a life.

  • October 3, 2011 at 3:26 pm
    Chad Balaamaba says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 2
    Thumb down 6

    it sounds like she’s trying to get a life, but she is failing.

  • October 3, 2011 at 3:33 pm
    C'mon, you guys.... says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 4
    Thumb down 0

    It’s the principal of the thing!

  • October 3, 2011 at 3:57 pm
    Tom Bruckmeyer says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 3
    Thumb down 3

    Next time someone goes to buy these sausages they will be $1.10 because Walmart will have added in their costs for screwing around with this self proclaimed activist. Thanks a lot Mary.

  • October 3, 2011 at 4:44 pm
    But she won! says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 3
    Thumb down 0

    It was the principal of the thing.

  • October 3, 2011 at 5:05 pm
    Glenn says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 3

    The JUDGE oughtto be recalled and the attorney should lose his license WHAT is wrong with our country!!!???

  • October 3, 2011 at 6:48 pm
    Fish Man says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 2
    Thumb down 1

    Well, for all of you negative commenters, obviously you don’t understand basic math…if Walmart overcharges 2 cents on every $1.00 of gross sales (2%)…….here, you figure it out. http://cdn.walmartstores.com/sites/AnnualReport/2010/PDF/02_WMT%202010_FiveYear%20Summary.pdf
    It’s Billions of dollars…..

  • October 5, 2011 at 8:31 am
    Agree says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 2
    Thumb down 0

    I agree with Bach to sue over 2 cents. It’s a matter of principle and not a matter of how many pennies she was overcharged. This happens all the time. Remember the prices from the shelves and when you go to checkout the price is higher. Check it out for yourself and you will see this happens across the board not just with sausages.

  • October 5, 2011 at 12:53 pm
    Bartleby says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 3
    Thumb down 0

    It’s actually worse than that Fish Man. It’s $0.02 on every $0.98 of gross sales. That’s 2.04% and not 2%. This is not sarcasm. That’s $8,262,940,000.00 per year instead of $8,100,920,000.00 if the overcharge is a ‘mere’ 2%. There you go folks – a difference of 0.04% in pricing on $405B in sales makes a difference of $162,020,000.00 in revenues per year. I’d call that significant.

    -Bartleby



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*