Ex-Store Owner Awarded $2M in Bank Lawsuit

March 14, 2011

  • March 15, 2011 at 12:41 pm
    Dar Novak says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 1
    Thumb down 0

    Rarely do I see an item like this that mentions the employer bonded the employee. Here’s how the Happy Ending goes: Employee is convicted, the bond pays, the employer is made whole and stays in business. Why are employers so stupid as to not bond their employees who handle money?

  • March 16, 2011 at 7:36 am
    It's the premium says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Probably the premium was “too much” at the time….

  • March 17, 2011 at 1:02 am
    T says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Did you read the article correctly? The bank drove the store out of business by WRONGFULLY demanding repayment for funds withdrawn by an embezzling employee. Does anyone know how much a bond for this would cost? It’s irrelevant!

  • March 21, 2011 at 12:09 pm
    GB says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I agree with T. The store did not create the problem, the bank did by allowing access to the credit line without following procedure. As the guilty party, they pay.

  • October 4, 2011 at 7:04 am
    bank ri customer says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    bank ri did the same thing to me!!!!!!!!!!!!
    i wonder how many other mistakes they have made, i bet all of their
    customers would like to know what kind of bank they run!!!!!!!



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*