The camera was operated remotely. The school district could turn it one from their computer. Neither the students or their parents were told of the “tracking” program hooked up to the webcam.
If he ws doing drugs they could not do anything about it. I guess they forgot about probable cause.
Well, I do not agree with B&N not giving the apology, I understand why they didn’t. the moment they apoligize, they are admitting they did wrong, and thus lose any possible defence they may or may not have had if the family desided to sue them even after they recieved an apology. Just like when you have an auto accident, you should not say you are sorry, even if you think you are 100% at fault.
not to mention the minors that potentially were dressing while they had the laptop open on their desk in their room….now video/pictures of a minor half dressed? Hmmm…
We have updated our privacy policy to be more clear and meet the new requirements of the GDPR. By continuing to use our site, you accept our revised Privacy Policy.
The camera was operated remotely. The school district could turn it one from their computer. Neither the students or their parents were told of the “tracking” program hooked up to the webcam.
If he ws doing drugs they could not do anything about it. I guess they forgot about probable cause.
Well, I do not agree with B&N not giving the apology, I understand why they didn’t. the moment they apoligize, they are admitting they did wrong, and thus lose any possible defence they may or may not have had if the family desided to sue them even after they recieved an apology. Just like when you have an auto accident, you should not say you are sorry, even if you think you are 100% at fault.
“Releases”, just like waivers, are not iron clad.
not to mention the minors that potentially were dressing while they had the laptop open on their desk in their room….now video/pictures of a minor half dressed? Hmmm…