Court: Pennsylvania City, Not Insurer, Must Pay Settlement

May 13, 2010

  • May 13, 2010 at 2:22 am
    Sue Smith says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Nice to see some courts are upholding contract law.

  • May 13, 2010 at 2:38 am
    wudchuck says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    “employee injury exception”… i think this would also make the exclusion for line of duty, since it was also in the office space and not actually on patrol… he was not in a jail… so the insurance company should be clear on all counts! the city on the other hand, better have money or she will own the town!

  • May 14, 2010 at 1:17 am
    blue moon says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I’m guessing the 50K for “line of duty” is the exception to the employee injury wording.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*